The UK creative sector saw intense debates about AI’s role this week. Parliament members discussed the Data (Use and Access) Bill that could change how AI uses books, music, and art for training. A research team from Queen Mary University showed how Generative AI helps writers brainstorm ideas but risks replacing entry-level jobs in publishing. Their report suggested labeling AI-made content clearly so human artists get proper credit.

In technology developments, Alibaba’s Qwen3 AI model emerged as a strong competitor to US systems. This Chinese program creates marketing videos and product descriptions faster than older tools while supporting multiple languages. Samsung’s deal to preinstall Perplexity AI apps on Galaxy S26 phones will put creative aids in millions of users’ hands – letting them generate social media posts and edit photos using voice commands.

Creative communities worldwide are adapting to AI tools. The *A Prompt A Day* challenge gives writers daily keywords like “network” or “ripples” to spark stories, with participants sharing results online. Similarly, the *OrigamiSpirit Astrology Challenge* uses AI-generated zodiac patterns to inspire craft projects. These trends show people embracing structured creativity where humans and machines collaborate.

Workforce changes are accelerating in China, where companies added over 50,000 AI-related jobs last month. Universities expanded courses teaching AI-assisted design to meet demand. Meanwhile, US presidential candidate RFK Jr. criticized "AI slop" – poorly made computer-generated articles and images affecting public decisions.

Ethical concerns remained central to discussions. British experts proposed transparency rules requiring AI companies to reveal what artwork they used for training. Creative professionals stressed that human connection remains vital – AI can’t replicate the emotions in a handwritten poem or live theater performance. As one researcher noted, *"Machines open new doors, but people still steer the ship"*.