Agentic AI Comparison:
AgentGPT vs Suna by Kortix AI
vs
Introduction
AgentGPT and Suna by Kortix AI are two intelligent agent platforms designed to automate digital tasks through natural language. While both aim to boost productivity and streamline user workflows, they differ fundamentally in their design philosophies, openness, and target audiences. This report compares their autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, cost, and popularity as of June 2025.
Overview
AgentGPT
AgentGPT is a web-based AI agent platform focused on providing accessible, no-code agent creation and deployment. It is typically proprietary, designed for mainstream users who want to build and execute goal-driven AI agents in the browser, with a focus on ease of use and guided workflows.
Suna by Kortix AI
Suna by Kortix AI is a fully open-source, generalist AI agent capable of not only conversation but executing complex, multi-step digital tasks. Released under Apache 2.0, Suna is designed for extensibility, allowing users to self-host and modify the agent, making it appealing for developers, researchers, and advanced teams. It emphasizes autonomy and transparency, with a strong community focus and a wide range of integrations.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
AgentGPT: 7
AgentGPT can perform multi-step tasks and execute defined goals with minimal input, but its action set and environment access are sandboxed to ensure safety and accessibility for broad audiences.
Suna by Kortix AI: 9
Suna acts on behalf of users with high autonomy, orchestrating real-world digital actions such as browsing, file management, command-line execution, and API interaction. As an open-source agent, its autonomy can be extended or restricted by the user.
Suna demonstrates greater native autonomy due to its open, extensible structure and deeper system integration compared to AgentGPT's more restricted operational model.
ease of use
AgentGPT: 9
AgentGPT offers an intuitive, web-based interface tailored for end-users with little or no technical background. Users can easily create, deploy, and monitor agents with step-by-step guidance, requiring no local installation.
Suna by Kortix AI: 6
Despite its conversational interface, Suna requires setup (local or server hosting) and some technical literacy to unlock its full potential. Its feature-rich and developer-oriented setup presents a learning curve for non-technical users.
AgentGPT is optimized for mainstream accessibility, while Suna prioritizes capabilities and extensibility, making it less beginner-friendly out-of-the-box.
flexibility
AgentGPT: 6
AgentGPT offers flexibility within the boundaries of its platform, supporting various agent goals, but is limited by proprietary constraints and a less modular architecture.
Suna by Kortix AI: 10
Suna is built for maximum flexibility, being open-source, highly modular, and customizable. Users can add or modify tools, adapt execution environments, and integrate new capabilities according to their needs.
Suna leads in flexibility due to its open-source codebase and strong focus on extensibility, whereas AgentGPT's proprietary model restricts deeper customization.
cost
AgentGPT: 6
AgentGPT typically operates on a freemium model; core features may be free, but advanced capabilities and higher usage are paywalled or subscription-based.
Suna by Kortix AI: 10
Suna is free and open source under the Apache 2.0 license, with no licensing fees. Users may incur infrastructure costs if self-hosted, but there are no mandatory subscription fees or proprietary lock-ins.
Suna offers a superior cost advantage due to its open-source nature, while AgentGPT may require ongoing payments for premium features or increased usage.
popularity
AgentGPT: 8
AgentGPT enjoys broad awareness and user base within the mainstream AI enthusiast community, benefitting from ease of access and a strong presence in web-based agent tools.
Suna by Kortix AI: 6
Suna is rapidly gaining traction among developers and open-source proponents, but remains a niche product compared to more established proprietary platforms. Its community is active and growing, especially in open-source and technical circles.
AgentGPT is currently more popular among the general public, although Suna's open-source appeal is driving strong growth within the developer and research segments.
Conclusions
AgentGPT and Suna by Kortix AI both enable users to automate digital workflows with intelligent agent technology. AgentGPT excels in user-friendliness and popularity, making it ideal for non-technical users seeking immediate results without setup hassles. Suna, on the other hand, stands out in autonomy, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness, offering deep customization and acting as a robust, extensible platform for power users, developers, and teams valuing transparency and control. The choice between them depends on the user's technical proficiency, required agent capabilities, and openness preferences.