Agentic AI Comparison:
Querix vs Suna by Kortix AI
vs
Introduction
Querix is a no-code workspace for creating business assistants grounded in company documents and configured tasks. Suna’s official destination now presents Kortix, an open-source platform for configured agents and connected workflows. Ratings are subjective editorial opinions about each product’s stated purpose, not measured benchmarks or a claim that different workflows are interchangeable.
Overview
Suna by Kortix AI
Suna’s official destination now presents Kortix, an open-source platform for configured agents and connected workflows.
Querix
Querix is a no-code workspace for creating business assistants grounded in company documents and configured tasks.
Editorial ratings · 1–10, higher is better
These scores express our judgement of the cited product facts. They are not measured performance benchmarks. Each product is assessed for its stated purpose; a higher score does not make different workflows interchangeable.
Evidence gaps lower confidence and affect the relevant judgement. Unknown pricing does not mean free access. Research prototypes and retired products retain their historical scope, with adoption ratings reflecting current access.
Ratings assessed: 2026-10-26. Source verification dates may differ.
Documented capability: How useful and complete is the documented workflow for the product's stated purpose?
- 1–2: No usable current workflow established, or only an unsupported promise.
- 3–4: Historical, experimental or very limited workflow; substantial delivery gaps.
- 5–6: Concrete but narrow workflow, or promising research requiring specialist review.
- 7–8: Substantial documented end-to-end workflow with useful controls or customization.
- 9–10: Exceptionally complete documented scope and controls; reserve 10 for unusually strong evidence.
Ease of adoption: Can the intended user obtain and set up a usable product today?
- 1–2: Discontinued, unavailable, waitlisted, or no usable deployment path verified.
- 3–4: Archived software, restricted research/preorder access or uncertain current service access.
- 5–6: Developer-managed setup, significant configuration or sales-led implementation.
- 7–8: Active accessible product with manageable setup for its intended user.
- 9–10: Straightforward self-service access and setup, with unusually few adoption obstacles.
Value and cost clarity: How attractive and understandable is the cost model for the documented use?
- 1–2: No current purchasable or usable offer; historical prices cannot support a purchase.
- 3–4: Material price, entitlement, license or availability uncertainty limits budgeting.
- 5–6: Plausible value with custom pricing, significant setup costs or incomplete selected-plan terms.
- 7–8: Useful scope with clear entry pricing/allowances or accessible source, while accounting for running costs.
- 9–10: Exceptionally accessible and clear cost model for substantial useful scope; never assume free compute.
Integration options: How useful and extensible are the verified user-facing connections for the intended workflow?
- 1–2: No current user-facing connection verified, or former connections are unavailable.
- 3–4: Inputs/exports or one focused connection; internal dependencies are not native connectors.
- 5–6: Useful API, configurable tools or several relevant connections, with limited verified breadth.
- 7–8: Broad relevant connections or an extensible documented API/MCP/tool ecosystem.
- 9–10: Extensive documented ecosystem with multiple connection mechanisms and strong task relevance.
Metrics Comparison
Documented capability
Querix: 7/10
Evidence confidence: medium
Assistants, task templates, documents and shared workspaces provide a practical business-assistance workflow.
Suna by Kortix AI: 8/10
Evidence confidence: medium
Agent execution, scheduled work, shared configuration and isolated computers support repeatable multi-step tasks.
Compare the workflow you need, not just the number of advertised features.
Ease of adoption
Querix: 8/10
Evidence confidence: medium
Hosted signup and a free entry plan support evaluation without developing an agent runtime.
Suna by Kortix AI: 6/10
Evidence confidence: medium
Managed or self-hosted deployment requires model access and connector configuration.
Check current access, setup and human responsibilities for your team.
Value and cost clarity
Querix: 7/10
Evidence confidence: medium
Free includes 50 queries/month; Starter lists €49/month and Pro €199/month. Confirm the Starter allowance because the page’s table and plan card differ.
Suna by Kortix AI: 6/10
Evidence confidence: medium
Source availability offers flexibility, but managed execution, models and infrastructure have separate costs.
Compare the full cost, including usage, implementation and required services.
Integration options
Querix: 6/10
Evidence confidence: medium
The official FAQ names Google Drive and OneDrive, document uploads and API-based connections. Confirm connector setup and plan scope for your systems.
Suna by Kortix AI: 8/10
Evidence confidence: medium
MCP/API connections, messaging channels, SDK and shared connector configuration provide broad extensibility.
Match the documented connections to the systems you actually use.
Conclusions
Use it for shared knowledge retrieval and repeatable support or internal tasks. Teams curate source material, configure assistants and review important answers and actions. Evaluate the current Kortix deployment rather than assuming older Suna plans still apply. Set tool permissions, model access and review gates.
The best framework is the one you can keep current and afford to run.
Run OpenClaw or Hermes with saved memory, one-click runtime updates, and your choice of Platform Credits, provider keys, or supported subscriptions.
Plans start at $199/month. Cancel anytime.
Hosted agent
OpenClaw or Hermes