Agentic AI Comparison:
Genspark Super Agent vs Suna by Kortix AI
vs
Introduction
Genspark Super Agent and Suna by Kortix AI are two prominent AI super agents designed for autonomous task execution and workflow automation. This report provides an in-depth comparison of these agents across key metrics: autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, cost, and popularity, to help users and organizations determine which solution best meets their needs.
Overview
Genspark Super Agent
Genspark Super Agent is a rapidly emerging AI tool known for its speed, efficiency, and capacity to autonomously carry out complex, multi-step tasks. It features robust media integration, lead generation tools, and agentic fact checking. GenSpark allows for quick deployment of outputs, including websites and interfaces, often in just a few prompts, and is praised for its multitasking capabilities and high-quality content generation.
Suna by Kortix AI
Suna by Kortix AI is a research-oriented super agent featuring a clean, informative UI that prioritizes transparency in its process. While Suna excels at breaking down and documenting tasks, its execution tends to be slower compared to Genspark, and it is more focused on web research and step-by-step task breakdowns. Its primary strength lies in transparency and accountability in automation workflows.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
Genspark Super Agent: 9
Genspark excels at independently planning and executing complex, multi-step tasks, demonstrating high levels of autonomy. It can multitask, deploy outputs, and even handle rich media and fact-checking with minimal human intervention.
Suna by Kortix AI: 7
Suna demonstrates strong autonomy in research and documentation-driven workflows, but its execution speed and multitasking depth are less advanced than Genspark. It tends to approach complex tasks methodically but can lag in simultaneous task execution.
Both agents are autonomous, but Genspark’s ability to multitask and quickly deploy results gives it a clear advantage.
ease of use
Genspark Super Agent: 8
Genspark offers an intuitive interface enabling users to create sophisticated outputs in just a few prompts. The workflow is streamlined, making it accessible for both technical and non-technical users.
Suna by Kortix AI: 7
Suna features a clean UI and provides informative feedback throughout the process. Although users appreciate the transparency, its stepwise breakdown can introduce additional steps, which may slow down simple tasks.
GenSpark is slightly easier for rapid prototyping and direct output, while Suna is preferred by those who prioritize detailed task transparency.
flexibility
Genspark Super Agent: 9
The agent integrates rich media, handles multiple workflows simultaneously, and supports a wide variety of outputs, from websites to lead-gen tools. Its multitasking feature offers significant flexibility for diverse use cases.
Suna by Kortix AI: 7
Suna’s flexibility is strongest in research and documentation-driven contexts, but it is not as versatile in creative content generation or in handling multiple concurrent tasks as Genspark.
GenSpark offers broader flexibility for both technical and creative use cases, while Suna is more focused but narrower in its application.
cost
Genspark Super Agent: 7
Pricing details are less transparent in the available sources, but Genspark positions itself as a premium solution with advanced capabilities. It is likely to be competitively priced within the AI super agent market.
Suna by Kortix AI: 8
Suna is open-source, which can be cost-effective for organizations capable of self-hosting or customizing the platform. This makes Suna attractive for budget-conscious users or developers.
Suna’s open-source model offers greater cost-effectiveness, while Genspark may require a subscription or licensing fee for access to premium features.
popularity
Genspark Super Agent: 8
Genspark has rapidly gained traction and reviews praise its efficiency, output quality, and multitasking. It is actively discussed in AI circles, particularly among early adopters and agencies.
Suna by Kortix AI: 6
While Suna has an open-source developer community and is respected for its transparency and research capabilities, it is less widely adopted and discussed than Genspark in mainstream AI and productivity forums.
GenSpark currently enjoys broader popularity, likely because of its commercial positioning and strong results in comparative benchmarks.
Conclusions
Genspark Super Agent is the stronger choice for users seeking high autonomy, speed, flexibility, and mainstream adoption, especially for rapid content creation and multitasking scenarios. Suna by Kortix AI stands out for its transparent, research-driven approach and cost-effectiveness, particularly for organizations looking for open-source customization. For most general business and agency needs, Genspark’s capabilities and ease of use offer a more compelling package, while Suna appeals to developers and researchers who value open-source solutions and granular process transparency.