Agentic AI Comparison:
Genspark Super Agent vs Manus
vs
Introduction
This comparison report evaluates two leading autonomous AI agents, Genspark Super Agent and Manus, across key metrics relevant for enterprise and individual users: autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, cost, and popularity. The report draws from expert reviews, user feedback, and recent market analyses to provide a comprehensive comparison.
Overview
Manus
Manus is developed by Chinese startup Monica and launched in 2025. It stands out for its ability to handle multi-domain workflows autonomously, integrate with platforms like Hugging Face, and manage a wide range of tasks including data analysis, content generation, and code deployment. Manus is versatile but is typically slower, requires more prompting, and is less autonomous compared to Genspark. It excels in research, tool integration, and multi-modal processing.
Genspark Super Agent
Genspark Super Agent is recognized for its advanced autonomy, adaptability, and seamless multi-tasking capabilities. It is designed to execute complex workflows with minimal user intervention, often outperforming competitors in speed and independent operation. Genspark excels at first-pass task execution but may struggle with code correction on subsequent requests. Its reputation for speed and autonomy has contributed to strong user adoption.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
Genspark Super Agent: 9
Genspark is highly autonomous and executes tasks with minimal oversight, often going ahead without extra questions, which boosts productivity.
Manus: 7
Manus can operate independently but is slower and requires more prompting and iteration to complete tasks compared to Genspark.
Genspark is superior in autonomy, executing tasks faster and more independently than Manus.
ease of use
Genspark Super Agent: 8
Genspark's minimalist interaction design and rapid execution make it easy for users to delegate tasks and expect quick results.
Manus: 7
Manus is user-friendly but can be slower and may require more user input to clarify or iterate on tasks, which can reduce efficiency for some workflows.
Genspark offers a more seamless user experience, while Manus is slightly less efficient due to slower execution and more required input.
flexibility
Genspark Super Agent: 8
Genspark supports a broad range of workflows and multi-tasking but may struggle with complex code corrections on repeated requests.
Manus: 9
Manus integrates with numerous external tools and platforms (like Hugging Face) and supports multi-modal content processing, code deployment, and file system management, making it highly flexible.
Manus offers superior flexibility due to its extensive integration capabilities and multi-modal processing, while Genspark is strong but less adaptable to complex tool integration.
cost
Genspark Super Agent: 6
Pricing information is not publicly detailed, but Genspark is positioned as a premium AI agent, likely reflecting its advanced features and speed.
Manus: 7
Manus does not explicitly publish pricing, but its broader tool integration and startup origins may offer more competitive or flexible pricing options for enterprise clients.
Both agents lack transparent pricing, but Manus may offer more cost-effective solutions for users needing extensive integrations.
popularity
Genspark Super Agent: 7
Genspark's speed and autonomy have garnered attention and strong initial user adoption, but it is a newer entrant in the market.
Manus: 7
Manus has rapidly gained recognition since its 2025 launch, especially in Asia and among users needing multi-domain and multi-modal support.
Both agents are similarly popular, with Genspark excelling in the West and Manus gaining traction in Asia and enterprise settings.
Conclusions
Genspark Super Agent and Manus are both leading contenders in the autonomous AI agent market. Genspark stands out for its speed, autonomy, and ease of use, making it ideal for users who prioritize quick, independent task execution. Manus offers greater flexibility through extensive tool integration and multi-modal processing, but requires more user input and is slower in execution. Both are similarly popular, with Genspark more favored for workflow speed and Manus for versatility. Pricing remains opaque for both, but Manus may offer more competitive options for enterprise needs. Overall, choice between the two depends on specific workflow requirements: speed and autonomy (Genspark) versus flexibility and integrations (Manus).