Skip to model comparison
AI Agent Store/Model comparisonsBuild an AI worker ↗

MODEL INTELLIGENCE · OCTOBER 2026

AI models, compared.
Choose with confidence.

Compare measured task results and estimated API costs. Set your workload to see which models are worth testing for your agent.

Data reviewed · LiveBench question set: 25 June 2026 · View every source ↗ · Download the data ↓

A starting point for your shortlist

Claude Fable 5.1 has the highest Agent Fit rating for general tasks at 79.6. Choose your task and monthly usage below to see how the ranking changes.

Explore the evidence ↓

RELEASE WATCH · CHECKED 2026-10-15

New models worth checking

Explore releases & upgrade costs ↗

See what is available, which versions have independent results, and how an upgrade could change your bill. MiniMax M3.1 Flash Preview is awaiting independent results here; GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Sonnet 5.5 have comparable benchmark results.

YOUR WORKLOAD. YOUR PRIORITIES.

Compare models for your workload

How our ratings work ↗

Estimate your monthly API cost

Tokens are the small pieces of text a model reads or produces. Include charged thinking tokens in output.

This estimate uses your token counts and standard text API rates. It excludes cache discounts, tool fees, retries and provider premiums. If your input and output exceed a model’s listed capacity, we leave its cost and Value rating blank. A large capacity does not guarantee that it will use every detail correctly.

THE MARKET MAP

Quality and cost

Sweet-spot zoneStrong price–quality tradeoffsTap a dot to inspect
SWEET SPOTCAPABILITY FIRST020406080100$1$10$100$1,000Agent Fit / 100 ↑← Lower cost · USD · log scale321SWEET SPOT020406080100$1$10$100$1,000Agent Fit / 100 ↑← Lower cost · USD · log scale321
78.9Agent Fit$1.94your workload
YOUR FAST SHORTLIST

Closest to the sweet spot

How we choose ↗
  1. 1
    DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ↗78.9 Agent Fit · $1.94
  2. 2
    Muse Spark 1.3 ↗79.3 Agent Fit · $21
  3. 3
    DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ↗71.1 Agent Fit · $1.44

Shaded zone: 75.2+ points and $21 or less. Numbers mark models with strong price–quality tradeoffs in or near this zone. On the dotted line, no other shown model is cheaper with an equal or higher score, or scores higher at the same price. Your chosen measure, usage and filters change this shortlist.

THE EVIDENCE, SIDE BY SIDE

AI model comparison table

61 of 61 models · select up to 4 to comparePrices in USD · tap ? for instant explanations
01
Claude Fable 5.1 ↗

Anthropic · max

Agent Fit 79.6
Value 56.3
Your cost $200
1.00M contextTool calling
Benchmarks & API pricing +
LiveBench
83.4
Evidence Consensus
94.4
Input / output per 1M tokens
$10 / $50
Price observation
Direct API
02
Claude Opus 5.5 ↗

Anthropic · max

Agent Fit 79.4
Value 60.7
Your cost $80
1.00M contextTool calling
Benchmarks & API pricing +
LiveBench
83.2
Evidence Consensus
Not enough evidence
Input / output per 1M tokens
$4 / $20
Price observation
Direct API
03
Muse Spark 1.3 ↗

Meta · xhigh

Agent Fit 79.3
Value 70.5
Your cost $21
1.05M contextTool calling
Benchmarks & API pricing +
LiveBench
81.6
Evidence Consensus
Not enough evidence
Input / output per 1M tokens
$1.25 / $4.25
Price observation
OpenRouter catalog
04
Claude Fable 5 ↗

Anthropic · source ID max; display xhigh

Agent Fit 79.0
Value 55.8
Your cost $200
1.00M contextTool calling
Benchmarks & API pricing +
LiveBench
83.0
Evidence Consensus
Not enough evidence
Input / output per 1M tokens
$10 / $50
Price observation
Direct API
05
Agent Fit 78.9
Value 84.2
Your cost $1.94
1.05M contextOpen weightsTool calling
Benchmarks & API pricing +
LiveBench
81.1
Evidence Consensus
Not enough evidence
Input / output per 1M tokens
$0.0158 / $0.891
Price observation
OpenRouter catalog
06
GPT-6 Astra ↗

OpenAI · max

Agent Fit 78.6
Value 55.6
Your cost $200
1.05M contextTool calling
Benchmarks & API pricing +
LiveBench
82.2
Evidence Consensus
44.4
Input / output per 1M tokens
$10 / $50
Price observation
Direct API
07
Muse Wonder ↗

Meta · max · version 1.0

Agent Fit 78.3
Value 60.0
Your cost $80
1.05M contextTool calling
Benchmarks & API pricing +
LiveBench
81.2
Evidence Consensus
Not enough evidence
Input / output per 1M tokens
$4 / $20
Price observation
OpenRouter catalog
08
GPT-6.1 Sol ↗

OpenAI · max

Agent Fit 77.7
Value 64.5
Your cost $40
1.05M contextTool calling
Benchmarks & API pricing +
LiveBench
81.6
Evidence Consensus
55.6
Input / output per 1M tokens
$2 / $10
Price observation
Direct API
09
Kimi K3 ↗

Moonshot AI · source default

Agent Fit 77.4
Value 65.6
Your cost $35
1.05M contextOpen weightsTool calling
Benchmarks & API pricing +
LiveBench
79.2
Evidence Consensus
Not enough evidence
Input / output per 1M tokens
$0.5 / $15
Price observation
OpenRouter catalog
10
GPT-5.6 Sol ↗

OpenAI · source ID max; display xhigh

Agent Fit 77.1
Value 59.1
Your cost $80
1.05M contextTool calling
Benchmarks & API pricing +
LiveBench
81.1
Evidence Consensus
Not enough evidence
Input / output per 1M tokens
$4 / $20
Price observation
Direct API
11
Qwen3.8 Max ↗

Alibaba · source default · version mapping unconfirmed

Agent Fit 77.0
Value —
Your cost —
Not verified context
Benchmarks & API pricing +
LiveBench
78.5
Evidence Consensus
Not enough evidence
Input / output per 1M tokens
Not verified
Price observation
Not verified
12
Muse Spark 1.2 ↗

Meta · xhigh

Agent Fit 76.3
Value 68.4
Your cost $21
1.05M contextTool calling
Benchmarks & API pricing +
LiveBench
78.0
Evidence Consensus
55.6
Input / output per 1M tokens
$1.25 / $4.25
Price observation
OpenRouter catalog
AI model benchmarks, aggregate ratings, API pricing and context windows. Snapshot 2026-10-15.
CompareInput / outputUSD / 1M tokens
01
Claude Fable 5.1 ↗Anthropic · max
79.656.394.42 sources83.41,501±6$2001.00M$10 / $50Direct API
02
Claude Opus 5.5 ↗Anthropic · max
79.460.7—83.2—$801.00M$4 / $20Direct API
03
Muse Spark 1.3 ↗Meta · xhigh
79.370.5—81.6—$211.05M$1.25 / $4.25OpenRouter catalog
04
Claude Fable 5 ↗Anthropic · source ID max; display xhighSource labels disagree
79.055.8—83.0—$2001.00M$10 / $50Direct API
05
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ↗DeepSeek · maxOpen weights
78.984.2—81.1—$1.941.05M$0.0158 / $0.891OpenRouter catalog
06
GPT-6 Astra ↗OpenAI · max
78.655.644.42 sources82.21,475±7$2001.05M$10 / $50Direct API
07
Muse Wonder ↗Meta · max · version 1.0
78.360.0—81.2—$801.05M$4 / $20OpenRouter catalog
08
GPT-6.1 Sol ↗OpenAI · max
77.764.555.62 sources81.61,484±9$401.05M$2 / $10Direct API
09
Kimi K3 ↗Moonshot AI · source defaultOpen weights
77.465.6—79.2—$351.05M$0.5 / $15OpenRouter catalog
10
GPT-5.6 Sol ↗OpenAI · source ID max; display xhighSource labels disagree
77.159.1—81.1—$801.05M$4 / $20Direct API
11
Qwen3.8 Max ↗Alibaba · source default · version mapping unconfirmed
77.0——78.5——Not verifiedNot verified
12
Muse Spark 1.2 ↗Meta · xhigh
76.368.455.62 sources78.01,492±8$211.05M$1.25 / $4.25OpenRouter catalog
13
Qwen3.8 Flash Next ↗Alibaba · source defaultOpen weights
76.2——76.2——Not verifiedNot verified
14
Gemini 3.7 Flash ↗Google · high
76.171.350.02 sources78.81,486±5 · preliminary$151.05M$0.75 / $3.75OpenRouter catalog
15
GPT-5.5 ↗OpenAI · xhigh
75.854.6—80.2—$1101.05M$5 / $30Direct API
16
Claude Opus 5 ↗Anthropic · max
75.756.161.12 sources80.11,489±5$1001.00M$5 / $25Direct API
17
Grok 4.6 ↗xAI · source default
75.365.6—78.0—$32500K$2 / $6OpenRouter catalog
18
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp ↗DeepSeek · experimental · source defaultOpen weightsPreview
75.179.5—76.8—$3.451.05M$0.2156 / $0.6468OpenRouter catalog
19
GPT-6 Sol ↗OpenAI · max
74.762.4—79.2—$401.05M$2 / $10Direct API
20
GPT-5.4 ↗OpenAI · xhigh
74.458.8—78.0—$551.05M$2.5 / $15Direct API
21
GPT-5.6 Terra ↗OpenAI · source ID max; display xhighSource labels disagree
74.160.4—77.9—$441.05M$2 / $12Direct API
22
Muse Spark 1.1 ↗Meta · source ID xhigh; display highSource labels disagree
74.066.8—75.3—$211.05M$1.25 / $4.25OpenRouter catalog
23
GLM-5.3 ↗Z.ai · source defaultOpen weights
73.773.8—76.1—$10.61.05M$0.1 / $4.8OpenRouter catalog
24
Grok 4.7 ↗xAI · xhigh
73.764.5—77.4—$32500K$2 / $6OpenRouter catalog
25
Qwen3.8 27B ↗Alibaba · source defaultOpen weights
73.576.3—75.3—$6.81.00M$0.24 / $2.2OpenRouter catalog
26
Gemini 3.8 Flash ↗Google · high
73.369.455.62 sources75.81,497±5 · preliminary$151.05M$0.75 / $3.75OpenRouter catalog
27
Claude Sonnet 5 ↗Anthropic · xhigh
73.361.4—76.0—$401.00M$2 / $10Direct API
28
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 ↗DeepSeek · source defaultOpen weights
73.374.0—77.4—$10.561.05M$0.66 / $1.98OpenRouter catalog
29
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ↗Google · highPreview
73.259.8—77.0—$441.05M$2 / $12OpenRouter catalog
30
Grok 4.5 ↗xAI · source default
73.164.1—75.8—$32500K$2 / $6OpenRouter catalog
31
Claude Opus 4.8 ↗Anthropic · max
73.054.2—76.2—$1001.00M$5 / $25Direct API
32
Claude Opus 4.7 ↗Anthropic · xhigh
72.954.1—76.5—$1001.00M$5 / $25Direct API
33
Mistral Large 4 ↗Mistral · highPreview
72.071.6—71.8—$10.981.05M$0.68 / $2.09OpenRouter catalog
34
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ↗DeepSeek · source defaultOpen weights
71.179.3—74.2—$1.441.05M$0.016 / $0.64OpenRouter catalog
35
Claude Sonnet 5.5 ↗Anthropic · max
71.059.8—75.7—$401.00M$2 / $10Direct API
36
Gemini 3.5 Flash ↗Google · high
70.861.516.72 sources74.61,478±4$331.05M$1.5 / $9OpenRouter catalog
37
Claude Opus 4.6 ↗Anthropic · high · adaptive thinking
70.552.555.62 sources74.51,504±3$1001.00M$5 / $25Direct API
38
Qwen3.7 Max ↗Alibaba · source default
70.463.3—73.1—$23.61.00M$1.48 / $4.43OpenRouter catalog
39
GPT-5.6 Luna ↗OpenAI · source ID max; display xhighSource labels disagree
70.475.7—73.6—$4.41.05M$0.2 / $1.2Direct API
40
Gemini 3.6 Flash ↗Google · high
70.367.311.12 sources73.61,482±4$151.05M$0.75 / $3.75OpenRouter catalog
41
GPT-5.2 Codex ↗OpenAI · source default
69.956.4—74.0—$45.5400K$1.75 / $14OpenRouter catalog
42
GPT-5.2 ↗OpenAI · high · 2025-12-11
69.856.4—74.6—$45.5400K$1.75 / $14OpenRouter catalog
43
Claude Sonnet 4.6 ↗Anthropic · medium · adaptive thinking
69.454.8—73.0—$601.00M$3 / $15Direct API
44
Inkling ↗Thinking Machines · xhighOpen weights
68.964.3—71.9—$18.1524K$1 / $4.05OpenRouter catalog
45
GLM-5.2 ↗Z.ai · source defaultOpen weights
68.567.1—73.2—$14.41.05M$0.04 / $7OpenRouter catalog
46
GPT-5.4 nano ↗OpenAI · xhigh
67.773.3—69.6—$4.5400K$0.2 / $1.25Direct API
47
GPT-6 Luna ↗OpenAI · max
67.775.5—72.0—$21.05M$0.1 / $0.5Direct API
48
GLM-5.3 Flash ↗Z.ai · source defaultOpen weights
67.274.5—71.6—$2.51.05M$0.15 / $0.5OpenRouter catalog
49
DeepSeek V4 Pro ↗DeepSeek · source defaultOpen weights
67.167.1—71.6—$13.371.05M$0.9553 / $1.91OpenRouter catalog
50
Kimi K2.6 ↗Moonshot AI · thinkingOpen weights
66.967.5—70.5—$13.32262K$0.65 / $3.41OpenRouter catalog
51
Claude Opus 4.5 ↗Anthropic · high · 64K thinking
66.749.8—72.6—$100200K$5 / $25Direct API
52
Claude Haiku 5.5 ↗Anthropic · max
66.074.4—67.9—$21.00M$0.1 / $0.5Direct API
53
Kimi K2.7 Code ↗Moonshot AI · source defaultOpen weights
64.865.0—68.4—$13.41262K$0.6712 / $3.35OpenRouter catalog
54
Qwen3.6 Plus ↗Alibaba · source default
63.969.0—68.9—$7.151.00M$0.325 / $1.95OpenRouter catalog
55
Nemotron 3 Ultra ↗NVIDIA · 550B A55B · source defaultOpen weights
63.866.4—67.4—$10.8262K$0.6 / $2.4OpenRouter catalog
56
MiniMax M3 ↗MiniMax · source default
63.169.5—67.3—$5.41.05M$0.3 / $1.2OpenRouter catalog
57
GPT-5.4 mini ↗OpenAI · xhigh
62.560.8—66.4—$16.5400K$0.75 / $4.5Direct API
58
DeepSeek V4 Flash ↗DeepSeek · source defaultOpen weights
61.673.1—65.5—$1.271.05M$0.091 / $0.182OpenRouter catalog
59
Qwen3.6 27B ↗Alibaba · source defaultOpen weights
60.065.3—64.0—$9.6262K$0.32 / $3.2OpenRouter catalog
59.565.5—63.9—$81.05M$0.3 / $2.5OpenRouter catalog
61
Grok 4.3 ↗xAI · source default
56.055.8—62.2—$17.51.00M$1.25 / $2.5OpenRouter catalog

— means a comparable result is unavailable. Consensus combines results for only 10 matched configurations. Model IDs, reasoning settings, source links and pricing differences are available on every model page. Downloadable model files can still have restrictions on commercial use.

LOOK BEYOND ONE NUMBER

Compare your shortlist

Change models ↑
ReasoningCodingAgentic codeMathematicsDataLanguageInstructions
Claude Opus 5.5GPT-6 SolDeepSeek V4.1 Flash
Selected AI models compared, with scores from the same LiveBench question set
MeasureClaude Opus 5.5maxGPT-6 SolmaxDeepSeek V4.1 Flashmax
Agent Fit79.474.778.9
Practical Value60.762.484.2
Evidence ConsensusInsufficient evidenceInsufficient evidenceInsufficient evidence
Workload cost$80$40$1.94
Context window1.00M1.05M1.05M
Tool callingSupportedSupportedSupported
Reasoning92.288.786.7
Coding89.381.880.0
Agentic coding71.752.977.3
Mathematics97.196.493.3
Data analysis80.381.279.3
Language86.385.381.2
Instruction following65.768.670.0
Input / output per 1M$4 / $20$2 / $10$0.0158 / $0.891

START WITH YOUR QUESTION

Choose a model for the work you do.

How production usage differs from benchmark quality

See which models Vercel AI Gateway customers use and where their token usage and spending go. Use those trends alongside task results and prices when building your shortlist.

Explore production usage and spending ↗

Popular model comparisons

LESS JARGON. BETTER DECISIONS.

AI model questions,
plain-English answers.

Explore the benchmark field guide ↗
What is the best AI model for an AI agent?+

There is no universal winner. Compare the task profile, tool support, reasoning configuration and total workload cost. Our Agent Fit score is a task-weighted shortlist; validate it using real tasks and your own tools.

How does AI Agent Store combine model benchmarks?+

Agent Fit gives more importance to the LiveBench skills needed for your selected task. Evidence Consensus combines relative rankings from LiveBench tests and Arena user votes only where the model version and setting match. Practical Value combines that ability score with how affordable the model is for your entered usage. Missing evidence is never filled with a guessed score.

Why do some models have no Consensus score?+

The snapshot has no verified matching Arena configuration for those models. Reasoning effort and version matter, so a result for a different setting is not silently reused. A missing score does not mean the model is weak.

Are these AI model rankings live?+

This is a reviewed snapshot, refreshed through a daily 05:30 Europe/Vilnius review. The last completed review is shown on the page; it is not a real-time feed. LiveBench uses its 25 June 2026 question set with model observations collected on the snapshot date. Arena and other sources have their own update dates, shown in the methodology.

What does an AI model context window mean?+

It is the advertised token capacity available to a request and its response. A large window lets you supply more information, but does not prove the model will retrieve or reason about every detail reliably.

Does a high benchmark score guarantee a reliable agent?+

No. Reliability also depends on prompts, tool design, permissions, retrieval, retry policies and evaluation. These pages compare models and reported evidence, not complete agent systems.

TURN YOUR SHORTLIST INTO SOMETHING USEFUL

A model is the beginning.
Give it a job to do.

Build an AI worker ↗
AI Agent Store · Model comparisons · Data reviewed 2026-10-15Sources, limitations & corrections ↗