Agentic AI Comparison:
Kosmos vs OneQuery
vs
Introduction
This report compares the Kosmos agent framework from Edison Scientific and the OneQuery open-source search/AI assistant tool across five key metrics: autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, cost, and popularity. The assessment is based on their documented capabilities, typical deployment patterns, and ecosystems, with scores from 1–10 where higher is better.
Overview
Kosmos
Kosmos, as described by Edison Scientific and its associated research and GitHub repositories, is positioned as a more advanced AI agent framework oriented toward complex, often enterprise-style or research-driven workflows. It emphasizes multi-step reasoning, knowledge integration, and agentic behavior, aiming to support sophisticated, semi-autonomous agents that can orchestrate tools, data sources, and planning logic beyond simple question answering.
OneQuery
OneQuery, as presented on its website and GitHub project, focuses on simplifying search and AI-powered querying over multiple data sources, leaning toward practical, developer-friendly integration rather than broad autonomous agency. It is designed as a lightweight, open-source tool that makes it straightforward to index, search, and expose AI-assisted query capabilities, prioritizing simplicity and direct control over fully autonomous behavior.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
Kosmos: 9
Kosmos is conceived as an agent framework with strong support for multi-step reasoning, planning, and orchestration of tools or knowledge bases, enabling agents to operate with a high degree of autonomy once configured. Its design philosophy resembles agentic platforms that treat retrieval and tool use as part of a reasoning loop, which typically allows agents to decompose tasks, route queries, and synthesize results with minimal manual intervention.
OneQuery: 5
OneQuery is primarily focused on enhancing search and query experiences rather than on building fully autonomous agents. It tends to run in a direct request–response pattern where queries are executed against configured indices or data sources, often under explicit user or application control, with limited built-in facilities for long-running task planning or multi-step autonomous workflows.
Kosmos substantially outperforms OneQuery in autonomy because it is built as an agentic framework that supports planning and orchestration, whereas OneQuery centers on smart search and querying with comparatively modest autonomous behavior.
ease of use
Kosmos: 7
Kosmos offers higher-level abstractions for defining agents, knowledge connections, and reasoning flows, which can simplify complex agent development for experienced users. However, this additional power and configuration complexity introduces a steeper learning curve, similar to other enterprise-grade agent platforms where understanding concepts like knowledge bases, tool orchestration, and multi-hop reasoning is required for effective use.
OneQuery: 8
OneQuery is designed as a focused, open-source tool for search and AI-assisted querying, with a smaller conceptual surface area than a full agent framework. Its configuration typically involves setting up data sources and query endpoints, which aligns well with common developer expectations around search tooling and makes it relatively straightforward to adopt and operate in typical web or backend environments.
OneQuery scores slightly higher on ease of use because its scope is narrower and closer to traditional search tooling, whereas Kosmos requires understanding richer agentic concepts that can be more demanding for new users.
flexibility
Kosmos: 9
Kosmos is intended to support a wide variety of agent behaviors, including complex reasoning over heterogeneous data, integration with multiple tools or APIs, and custom orchestration logic. This makes it highly flexible for use cases ranging from research assistants to enterprise automation, provided that the user is comfortable configuring and extending the framework.
OneQuery: 7
OneQuery is flexible within the domain of search and query experiences, offering developers options for connecting different data sources and integrating AI for query understanding and response generation. However, its core design is more specialized around search, which limits its flexibility compared to a general agent framework when it comes to complex task planning, multi-tool orchestration, or workflow automation outside the search context.
Kosmos offers broader flexibility across diverse agentic scenarios, while OneQuery provides solid but more domain-specific flexibility focused on search and information retrieval workflows.
cost
Kosmos: 7
The effective cost of using Kosmos depends on compute, model usage, and any associated platform charges when deployed in production-like settings. Its agentic capabilities often involve more complex reasoning and multiple tool or model calls per task, which can drive up resource usage compared to simpler systems, though these costs may be justified for higher-value, complex workflows.
OneQuery: 9
OneQuery is open source and can be self-hosted, which allows organizations to control infrastructure expenses and avoid vendor lock-in. Its search-centric design typically results in more predictable and often lower per-query costs, especially when used primarily as an efficient retrieval layer with optional AI augmentation rather than as a heavy multi-step reasoning agent.
OneQuery generally has a cost advantage due to its open-source nature and lighter query patterns, whereas Kosmos may incur higher compute and model costs to support its richer agentic behavior.
popularity
Kosmos: 6
Kosmos is relatively specialized and aligned with more advanced agentic workflows, which tends to attract a focused but smaller community compared to mainstream developer tools. Its adoption is more concentrated among users exploring sophisticated AI agents and research-oriented or enterprise scenarios rather than broad, general-purpose usage.
OneQuery: 7
OneQuery participates in the large and active ecosystem of open-source search and AI-augmented querying tools, benefiting from the broad interest in practical retrieval solutions. While it may not be among the largest projects, its alignment with common developer needs around search and its open-source availability generally support a wider base of casual and professional adopters.
Both tools serve relatively specialized audiences, but OneQuery likely enjoys somewhat broader popularity because it aligns with mainstream search and retrieval use cases and is available as an open-source project, while Kosmos targets a narrower segment focused on advanced agent frameworks.
Conclusions
Overall, Kosmos is best suited for scenarios that demand high autonomy, rich multi-step reasoning, and flexible orchestration of tools and knowledge sources, making it a strong choice for advanced agentic applications despite higher complexity and potentially greater operational costs. OneQuery excels as a practical, cost-efficient, and relatively easy-to-use solution for AI-augmented search and querying, offering solid flexibility within that domain and benefiting from an open-source model and broader relevance to everyday developer workflows. Organizations prioritizing sophisticated autonomous agents and complex workflows will tend to favor Kosmos, whereas teams focused on implementing robust AI-powered search and query capabilities with lower overhead and cost will often find OneQuery more appropriate.