Agentic AI Comparison:
Bitget GetAgent vs ChainGPT AI Agent

Bitget GetAgent - AI toolvsChainGPT AI Agent logo

Introduction

This report provides a detailed comparison between ChainGPT AI Agent and Bitget GetAgent, two AI agents focused on Web3 and crypto functionalities. Metrics evaluated include autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, cost, and popularity, based on available data from official announcements and reviews.

Overview

Bitget GetAgent

Bitget GetAgent is an advanced, Level 4 AI trading assistant integrated into the Bitget exchange. It enables real-time market analysis, strategy building, personalized recommendations, and direct trade execution across spot, futures, and on-chain markets via natural language chats.

ChainGPT AI Agent

ChainGPT AI Agent is a Web3 AI companion announced by ChainGPT, designed to combine deep AI-driven market analysis with blockchain interactions. It serves as a decentralized automation tool for crypto and Web3 tasks, though specific operational details remain limited in public sources.

Metrics Comparison

autonomy

Bitget GetAgent: 9

Operates as a 'Level 4 AI Agent' with autonomous multi-step task execution, closed-loop feedback for continuous improvement, and full trade execution without user intervention beyond confirmation.

ChainGPT AI Agent: 6

Positioned as a Web3 AI companion for decentralized automation, suggesting moderate autonomy in blockchain tasks, but lacks detailed evidence of multi-step execution or closed-loop learning.

GetAgent demonstrates superior autonomy through its advanced AI architecture and integration for independent trading actions, while ChainGPT's capabilities are more conceptual.

ease of use

Bitget GetAgent: 9

Chat-based interface turns complex trading into plain text commands, integrated directly into the Bitget app for seamless analysis-to-execution workflow, accessible to novices and experts.

ChainGPT AI Agent: 7

As a Web3 companion, it likely offers intuitive AI-driven interactions, but insufficient details on user interface or natural language processing compared to trading-specific tools.

GetAgent excels with its unified, conversational design eliminating manual navigation, giving it a clear edge over ChainGPT's less documented usability.

flexibility

Bitget GetAgent: 9

Supports spot, futures, on-chain, DCA plans, portfolio analysis, and adaptive bots across Bitget's Universal Exchange framework with 50+ MCP tools.

ChainGPT AI Agent: 7

Broad Web3 focus implies versatility in decentralized tasks and market analysis, but specifics on trading modes or integrations are not detailed in available sources.

GetAgent offers greater flexibility through comprehensive trading integrations and crypto-native tools, while ChainGPT appears more general-purpose.

cost

Bitget GetAgent: 8

Appears free/included for Bitget users, with pilot access prioritized for VIPs and BGB holders; no direct costs mentioned beyond exchange usage.

ChainGPT AI Agent: 7

Likely follows ChainGPT's freemium or token-based model similar to other crypto AI tools, but no explicit pricing details available.

Both seem low or no-cost for users, with GetAgent potentially more accessible via exchange integration, though priority access may limit free tier.

popularity

Bitget GetAgent: 8

Features multiple YouTube reviews, detailed articles, and promotion as Bitget's flagship AI tool, indicating higher user interest and media coverage.

ChainGPT AI Agent: 5

Limited visibility with sparse reviews or user feedback; primarily known through ChainGPT's blog announcements without widespread adoption evidence.

GetAgent shows stronger popularity backed by reviews and integrations on a major exchange, contrasting ChainGPT's lower profile.

Conclusions

Bitget GetAgent outperforms ChainGPT AI Agent across most metrics, particularly in autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, and popularity, due to its mature integration and trading-specific features. ChainGPT holds potential in decentralized Web3 applications but requires more development and documentation for competitive parity. Users prioritizing trading execution should favor GetAgent.