Agentic AI Comparison:
Harvey vs Legora
vs
Introduction
This report compares two leading legal AI assistants as of June 2025: Legora and Harvey. Harvey has demonstrated strong performance in the recent VLAIR benchmark study, establishing itself as a top performer in the legal AI space. Legora is a newer entrant gaining traction among law firms seeking AI-native solutions. This comparison evaluates both platforms across five key metrics to help legal professionals determine which solution best meets their needs.
Overview
Harvey
Harvey is a market-leading legal AI assistant that has raised over $200 million and achieved unicorn status since its founding in 2022. In the 2025 VLAIR benchmark study, Harvey emerged as the top performer, outperforming human lawyers in several key legal tasks. It excelled particularly in document Q&A (94.8%) and chronology generation (80.2%), demonstrating its advanced capabilities in handling complex legal workflows.
Legora
Legora is an emerging legal AI platform that has recently secured Series B funding led by General Catalyst. It's being adopted by forward-thinking law firms seeking comprehensive AI-native tools for legal workflows. While newer to the market than some competitors, Legora is gaining recognition for its innovative approach to legal AI implementation.
Metrics Comparison
Autonomy
Harvey: 9
Harvey demonstrated exceptional autonomy in the VLAIR benchmark, matching or outperforming human lawyers in five tasks and other AI tools in four tasks. Its standout performance in document Q&A (94.8%) and chronology generation (80.2%) indicates highly developed autonomous capabilities.
Legora: 7
While specific autonomy benchmarks for Legora are not available in the VLAIR study, as a modern legal AI solution designed for law firm deployment, it likely offers significant autonomous capabilities in standard legal tasks like document review and analysis.
Harvey has demonstrated superior autonomy through verified benchmark testing, while Legora's autonomy capabilities remain promising but less documented in independent studies.
Ease of Use
Harvey: 8
Harvey's widespread adoption suggests strong usability, though the VLAIR study focused on performance rather than user experience metrics. Its comprehensive participation in benchmark testing (six out of seven tasks) indicates versatility across different use cases.
Legora: 8
As a newer platform focusing on firm-wide deployment, Legora likely emphasizes user experience and integration with existing workflows to facilitate adoption across legal organizations.
Both solutions appear to prioritize ease of use, with Harvey's established market presence suggesting proven usability and Legora potentially offering fresh user experience innovations.
Flexibility
Harvey: 9
Harvey demonstrated exceptional flexibility by participating in six out of seven tasks in the VLAIR study, more than any other vendor. Its strong performance across diverse tasks (document Q&A, extraction, redlining, transcript analysis, and chronology generation) showcases its adaptability to different legal workflows.
Legora: 7
Legora's positioning as an AI-native tool for firm-wide deployment suggests adaptability across various legal workflows, though specific capabilities are less documented in the available research.
Harvey demonstrates superior flexibility through its verified performance across numerous legal tasks, while Legora's flexibility remains promising but less extensively documented.
Cost
Harvey: 6
As an established market leader with unicorn status ($200M+ funding), Harvey likely commands premium pricing reflective of its benchmark-leading performance, though this may present cost barriers for smaller firms.
Legora: 7
As a newer entrant that has recently secured Series B funding, Legora likely offers competitive pricing to drive adoption, though specific pricing information is not available in the research.
Legora potentially offers better cost efficiency as a newer market entrant, while Harvey's premium positioning and established market presence likely result in higher pricing.
Popularity
Harvey: 9
Harvey has established itself as a market leader, described as the 'fastest-growing legal technology startup' having raised over $200 million and achieved unicorn status. Its prominence in benchmark studies and widespread adoption demonstrate its strong market position.
Legora: 6
Legora is gaining traction among law firms as mentioned in the legal tech trends report, with its recent Series B funding indicating growing market interest and confidence from investors.
Harvey clearly leads in market popularity and recognition, benefiting from longer market presence and proven performance, while Legora is still building its market position despite promising growth.
Conclusions
Harvey emerges as the current market leader with exceptional performance across multiple legal tasks, particularly excelling in document Q&A and analysis capabilities as validated by the VLAIR benchmark study. Its extensive funding and unicorn status reflect strong market confidence in its capabilities. Legora represents a promising newer entrant gaining traction among law firms implementing AI-native solutions, potentially offering competitive pricing and fresh approaches to legal AI implementation. For organizations prioritizing proven performance and comprehensive capabilities across diverse legal tasks, Harvey presents a compelling choice despite potentially higher costs. Firms seeking emerging alternatives with potentially favorable pricing and innovative approaches may find Legora worth exploring, particularly as it continues to develop its market presence following recent Series B funding.