Agentic AI Comparison:
GitLab Duo vs Smol AI Developer
vs
Introduction
This report provides a detailed comparison between Smol AI Developer, an open-source AI coding agent for autonomous task handling in local environments, and GitLab Duo, a comprehensive AI suite integrated into the GitLab DevSecOps platform for team workflows and full lifecycle support.
Overview
Smol AI Developer
Smol AI Developer is a lightweight, open-source AI agent that runs locally, autonomously plans and executes coding tasks using tools like file editing, shell commands, and browser automation. It emphasizes simplicity and independence from cloud services, ideal for individual developers seeking a self-contained coding assistant.
GitLab Duo
GitLab Duo is an enterprise-grade AI-powered suite embedded across GitLab's platform, offering code completion, chat assistance contextualized to projects, merge request automation, CI/CD root cause analysis, security scanning, and multi-agent collaboration. It excels in team environments with deep DevSecOps integration.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
GitLab Duo: 6
Moderate autonomy focused on workflow assistance within GitLab; supports agent platforms for parallel collaboration but requires GitLab infrastructure and is less independent for standalone task execution.
Smol AI Developer: 9
High autonomy as a fully local, open-source agent that independently plans, executes, and iterates on tasks using built-in tools without external dependencies or platform lock-in.
Smol AI Developer excels in independent, local autonomy, while GitLab Duo prioritizes guided assistance in integrated team environments.
ease of use
GitLab Duo: 8
Seamless for GitLab users with native integrations across IDEs, web UI, and workflows; editor experience is smooth but slightly less polished than competitors.
Smol AI Developer: 7
Straightforward local setup via GitHub repo for tech-savvy users, but requires configuring local models and tools, potentially challenging for beginners.
GitLab Duo offers easier onboarding for platform users, while Smol AI Developer suits those comfortable with open-source setups.
flexibility
GitLab Duo: 5
Limited to GitLab ecosystem for full features; supports multiple models and IDEs but incurs platform lock-in and requires subscriptions.
Smol AI Developer: 9
Highly flexible as open-source, locally runnable on any machine, works across projects/IDEs without platform ties, and customizable via code.
Smol AI Developer provides superior cross-platform flexibility; GitLab Duo is rigid but powerful within its unified environment.
cost
GitLab Duo: 4
Enterprise pricing at ~$39/user/month plus GitLab Ultimate subscription; significant for small teams or individuals.
Smol AI Developer: 10
Free and open-source; only costs are local compute and optional model hosting, no subscriptions required.
Smol AI Developer is vastly more cost-effective for individuals; GitLab Duo justifies expense for enterprise teams.
popularity
GitLab Duo: 8
High adoption in enterprise DevSecOps teams using GitLab, backed by major platform; part of rising AI coding tool trend with strong market presence.
Smol AI Developer: 4
Niche open-source project with growing GitHub interest but limited mainstream adoption compared to commercial tools as of 2025.
GitLab Duo benefits from GitLab's established user base; Smol AI Developer appeals to indie/open-source communities.
Conclusions
Smol AI Developer is ideal for cost-conscious individual developers prioritizing autonomy, flexibility, and zero-cost local operation (average score: 7.8). GitLab Duo suits enterprise teams needing integrated DevSecOps AI across workflows, despite higher costs and lock-in (average score: 6.2). Choose based on team size, platform preference, and budget.