Agentic AI Comparison:
Smoove Call vs Speaq.ai
vs
Introduction
This report provides a detailed comparison between Smoove Call and Speaq.ai, two AI voice agent platforms designed for automating phone interactions such as customer service, lead generation, and appointment scheduling. Metrics evaluated include autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, cost, and popularity, based on available data from comparisons, reviews, and product insights.
Overview
Smoove Call
Smoove Call is a no-code platform for building AI voice agents focused on automating inbound and outbound phone calls for customer service, lead generation, and appointment scheduling. It emphasizes ease of deployment without coding and integrates with telephony providers like Twilio.
Speaq.ai
Speaq.ai is an AI voice platform offering advanced voice agents for enterprise use cases including sales, support, and automation. It supports scalable deployments with features like custom voices, API integrations, and enterprise-grade reliability, as highlighted in pricing and use case pages.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
Smoove Call: 8
Smoove Call enables fully autonomous AI phone agents for handling calls independently in no-code setups, suitable for standard automation tasks like lead gen and scheduling, as noted in comparisons with other voice AI platforms.
Speaq.ai: 9
Speaq.ai demonstrates high autonomy in enterprise scenarios, managing complex interactions with low latency and scalability for high-volume calls, including options for data residency and on-premise elements inferred from similar platforms.
Speaq.ai edges out due to enterprise-scale autonomy, while Smoove Call excels in straightforward no-code autonomy.
ease of use
Smoove Call: 9
As a no-code platform, Smoove Call prioritizes drag-and-drop interfaces for quick agent building, making it highly accessible for non-technical users automating phone systems.
Speaq.ai: 7
Speaq.ai offers user-friendly tools but leans toward enterprise with more configuration options like API and custom integrations, requiring some technical setup compared to pure no-code alternatives.
Smoove Call is easier for beginners; Speaq.ai suits teams comfortable with advanced features.
flexibility
Smoove Call: 8
Supports flexible no-code customizations, Twilio integration, and various voices, allowing adaptation for customer service and sales calls.
Speaq.ai: 9
High flexibility with extensive voice options (100+), API access, custom use cases, and enterprise scalability across telephony and web integrations.
Speaq.ai provides broader flexibility for diverse enterprise applications.
cost
Smoove Call: 8
Usage-based pricing with credits (1-2 per minute for voices) and free tiers/trials make it affordable for startups; no monthly subscription in related tools suggests competitive pay-per-use model.
Speaq.ai: 7
Offers tiered pricing with API and premium features, suitable for scale but potentially higher for enterprises due to advanced capabilities; comparable to industry standards.
Smoove Call is more cost-effective for small-scale use; Speaq.ai justifies costs for high-volume needs.
popularity
Smoove Call: 7
Frequently featured in AI agent comparisons (e.g., vs. Synthflow) and cold-calling software reviews, indicating growing adoption in SMB voice automation.
Speaq.ai: 8
Appears in enterprise voice AI rankings and comparisons (e.g., vs. Jazon), with emphasis on scalability and call volume, suggesting stronger enterprise traction.
Speaq.ai shows higher popularity in enterprise contexts; Smoove Call is popular among no-code users.
Conclusions
Smoove Call is ideal for non-technical users seeking quick, cost-effective no-code voice automation (average score: 8.0), while Speaq.ai excels in enterprise environments requiring scalability and advanced features (average score: 8.0). Choice depends on scale and technical needs; both are strong contenders in AI voice agents.