Agentic AI Comparison:
May Mobility vs Stemrobo
vs
Introduction
This report compares STEMROBO, an EdTech company focused on K-12 STEM, robotics, and AI education solutions, with May Mobility, an autonomous vehicle company providing driverless microtransit and shuttle services. The comparison is framed around five metrics—autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, cost, and popularity—interpreted in the context of each company’s primary domain (education technology vs. autonomous mobility).
Overview
May Mobility
May Mobility is an autonomous vehicle company founded in 2017 in Ann Arbor, Michigan, that develops and operates driverless shuttle and microtransit services in partnership with cities and transit agencies. It has delivered hundreds of thousands of autonomy‑enabled rides across the U.S. and Japan, deploying accessible autonomous vehicles (including wheelchair‑accessible fleets) powered by its proprietary Multi‑Policy Decision Making (MPDM) system for safe decision‑making in urban, suburban, and rural environments.
Stemrobo
STEMROBO is a K-12 focused educational technology company based in India that designs and deploys STEM, robotics, AI, IoT, AR/VR and innovation labs for schools, along with associated hardware, software platforms, and curriculum content. Its mission is to foster curiosity, creativity, and 21st‑century skills such as computational thinking and design thinking through project‑based and experiential learning, using tools like block‑based programming, Python, AI modules, 3D design, Arduino, and DIY kits.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
May Mobility: 9
May Mobility is built around full‑stack autonomous driving technology and microtransit operations, using its proprietary MPDM system to virtually simulate thousands of scenarios per second for safe decision‑making. It has deployed driverless shuttles and microtransit vans in active public service, providing over 320,000–335,000 autonomy‑enabled rides globally on fixed and flexible routes in real‑world traffic. Given its production deployments, safety focus, and role as a recognized autonomous vehicle provider, its autonomy score is very high.
Stemrobo: 5
STEMROBO’s offerings are primarily educational labs, hardware kits, and software platforms that support human‑guided learning in robotics, AI, IoT, and AR/VR, rather than fully autonomous operational systems. While its tools can be used by students to build and program autonomous robots and AI projects, the company itself is not delivering end‑to‑end autonomous services in production environments; autonomy is a learning objective more than a core delivered capability, so its autonomy level is moderate in terms of finished solutions.
In autonomy as an operational capability, May Mobility significantly outperforms STEMROBO, which focuses on teaching autonomy‑related concepts rather than operating autonomous fleets.
ease of use
May Mobility: 7
For end riders, May Mobility aims to integrate with public transit and offer simple shuttle or microtransit experiences, often via familiar transit interfaces, making the service straightforward to use from a passenger perspective. However, for cities and agencies, deployment involves significant technical, regulatory, and operational integration around routes, infrastructure, and safety validation, which adds complexity compared to conventional transport procurement, slightly lowering its overall ease‑of‑use score.
Stemrobo: 8
STEMROBO explicitly targets K‑12 students and educators, providing block‑based programming, guided curricula, and structured project‑based activities that are designed to make complex topics like AI, Python, robotics, and electronics accessible to non‑experts. Its innovation labs, AR/VR modules, and DIY kits are framed as interactive and fun learning experiences, which reduces the barrier to adoption for schools and teachers seeking turnkey STEM solutions.
STEMROBO is easier to adopt and operate in its target context (K‑12 classrooms) than May Mobility is in its context (city‑scale autonomous transit systems), so STEMROBO scores higher on ease of use despite May Mobility’s rider‑friendly service design.
flexibility
May Mobility: 7
May Mobility operates autonomous shuttles in urban, suburban, and rural environments and partners with public transit agencies on both fixed and microtransit‑style routes, highlighting adaptability to different geographies and service models. Nevertheless, deployments are still bounded by regulatory approval, infrastructure readiness, and specific route or zone design, making flexibility substantial but constrained relative to a purely software‑ or curriculum‑based offering.
Stemrobo: 8
STEMROBO supports a wide range of learning domains—STEM labs, robotics, AI & IoT labs, AR/VR labs, and innovation hubs—giving schools multiple configurations for curriculum integration and lab setups. Its offerings span block‑based coding, Python, 3D design, electronics, Arduino, and project‑based learning, which can be tailored to different age groups and learning objectives, providing strong flexibility in educational use cases and deployment models across varied school environments.
Both companies are flexible within their domains, but STEMROBO’s mix‑and‑match lab types, content, and tools give it slightly higher flexibility in how customers can configure and use its solutions compared with May Mobility’s more infrastructure‑dependent deployments.
cost
May Mobility: 6
May Mobility’s autonomous microtransit services involve outfitting vehicles with advanced sensors and computing stacks, operating fleets, and integrating with city infrastructure and regulations, all of which are capital‑ and operations‑intensive compared with conventional software products. Although the company positions autonomy as a way to improve efficiency and equity in public transport, the current stage of autonomous vehicle deployment suggests higher per‑deployment costs for municipalities than typical EdTech solutions, yielding a moderate cost score.
Stemrobo: 8
STEMROBO targets K‑12 institutions in India and abroad with lab setups, hardware kits, and content that are designed to be scalable across many schools, which typically implies cost‑sensitive pricing models suitable for education budgets. While specific price points are not publicly detailed, the focus on widespread adoption in schools and expansion to multiple countries suggests relatively economical, repeatable lab packages compared with large infrastructure projects, resulting in a high but not maximum cost‑effectiveness score.
Relative to their domains, STEMROBO’s packaged labs and educational solutions are likely more affordable and lower‑risk to procure than city‑scale autonomous vehicle deployments from May Mobility, so STEMROBO scores higher on cost efficiency.
popularity
May Mobility: 8
May Mobility is frequently listed among leading U.S. autonomous vehicle companies and appears in rankings and technology press coverage as a top player in the autonomous shuttle segment. Its partnerships with major automotive companies such as Toyota and its hundreds of thousands of public rides across multiple countries increase its profile in both industry and mainstream discussions about autonomous mobility, giving it a high popularity score within and beyond its niche.
Stemrobo: 6
STEMROBO is recognized within the K‑12 EdTech and STEM‑lab niche, with ongoing expansion plans and ambitions to reach dozens of countries, but it is not widely cited as a global consumer or enterprise brand. Its visibility appears strongest in Indian and select international education markets rather than in mainstream technology or mobility media, indicating moderate but domain‑specific popularity.
May Mobility enjoys higher global and industry visibility due to its role in the autonomous vehicle ecosystem and frequent media coverage, while STEMROBO remains more specialized and regionally focused in K‑12 EdTech, resulting in a popularity advantage for May Mobility.
Conclusions
STEMROBO and May Mobility operate in fundamentally different domains—K‑12 STEM education versus autonomous public transit—so their metrics must be interpreted contextually rather than as direct competitors. STEMROBO excels in ease of use, flexibility, and cost within school environments, offering accessible, modular STEM and AI labs that help students learn to design and program autonomous systems. May Mobility, by contrast, leads on operational autonomy and broader market visibility, deploying production‑grade autonomous shuttles and microtransit services that have delivered hundreds of thousands of rides and garnered significant industry recognition. For stakeholders in education seeking scalable STEM and AI learning infrastructure, STEMROBO is the more appropriate choice, whereas cities, transit agencies, and mobility partners evaluating autonomous transportation solutions would find May Mobility more aligned with their autonomy and service delivery needs.