Agentic AI Comparison:
InPage AI vs Pine AI
vs
Introduction
This report compares Pine AI, a specialized autonomous AI agent for handling consumer tasks like bill negotiations, subscriptions, and disputes, with InPage AI, a browser extension designed to integrate AI assistance seamlessly into web workflows without tab-switching.
Overview
InPage AI
InPage AI is a browser extension that enables effortless AI interaction within the user's current webpage, allowing content generation, summarization, or assistance without disrupting browsing flow. It prioritizes convenience for general productivity tasks.
Pine AI
Pine AI (19pine.ai) is a ChatGPT-like AI agent that autonomously performs real-world tasks such as calling companies, emailing, and negotiating bills or resolving complaints. It uses a pay-on-success model, focusing on consumer advocacy with high autonomy for complex, multi-step workflows.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
InPage AI: 4
InPage AI provides on-demand AI support within the browser but relies on user prompts and does not perform independent actions like external communications or automations.
Pine AI: 9
Pine AI excels in independent task execution, handling multi-step workflows like bill negotiations and dispute resolutions with minimal user input, including calls and emails on behalf of users.
Pine AI significantly outperforms InPage AI in autonomy due to its agentic design for real-world actions, while InPage AI is more of an assistive tool.
ease of use
InPage AI: 9
Browser extension integrates directly into web pages, eliminating the need to switch tabs or copy-paste, praised for maintaining user flow.
Pine AI: 8
Simple natural language chat interface for task delegation; pay-on-success and secure pre-authorization make it accessible and low-risk for non-technical users.
InPage AI edges out slightly for seamless web integration, but Pine AI's straightforward chat and results-based payment offer comparable intuitiveness for its specialized use.
flexibility
InPage AI: 7
Versatile for any web-based AI task like writing or analysis anywhere in the browser, but limited to browser contexts without external actions.
Pine AI: 7
Handles a wide range of consumer issues (bills, refunds, subscriptions across utilities, telecom, etc.) but specialized in advocacy tasks rather than general-purpose.
Both score evenly; Pine AI is flexible within consumer problem-solving, while InPage AI adapts to diverse web productivity needs.
cost
InPage AI: 6
Likely subscription or freemium model typical for browser extensions, but no specific pricing details available; assumes standard costs without success guarantees.
Pine AI: 9
Pay-as-you-go with custom tips and only charged on successful task completion; no payment if no results, minimizing risk.
Pine AI's performance-based pricing is superior for value, as users pay only for outcomes, unlike InPage AI's presumed ongoing fees.
popularity
InPage AI: 5
Listed in software directories with alternatives noted, indicating some adoption, but limited mentions or buzz in search results.
Pine AI: 6
Emerging tool loved by thousands, featured in reviews and news for niche consumer tasks, but still niche compared to general platforms as of 2025.
Pine AI shows slightly higher traction in AI agent communities, while InPage AI has modest visibility primarily in productivity tool lists.
Conclusions
Pine AI is the stronger choice for users needing autonomous handling of real-world consumer issues like bills and refunds, leading in autonomy and cost efficiency. InPage AI suits quick, in-browser AI assistance for general web tasks, excelling in ease of integration. Selection depends on whether task automation or workflow enhancement is prioritized.