Agentic AI Comparison:
11x AI vs Origami Agents
vs
Introduction
This report compares 11x AI and Origami Agents, two AI-powered sales automation platforms. 11x AI focuses on fully autonomous digital workers for end-to-end outbound sales, while Origami Agents emphasizes augmentation with high-precision research and intent-signal detection for human sales teams.
Overview
11x AI
11x AI delivers autonomous AI SDRs like Alice that handle prospecting, personalized multichannel outreach (email, LinkedIn, calls), follow-ups, and meeting booking 24/7. It integrates with existing tools, adapts in real-time, supports multilingual operations, and targets enterprise-scale sales automation.
Origami Agents
Origami Agents provides no-code, natural language-configurable agents for real-time lead generation, intent monitoring, and research briefs using web scraping and LLMs. It detects buying signals from public data (e.g., hiring, social signals) but leaves outreach to humans, ensuring high-quality, contextual insights across industries like SaaS and healthcare.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
11x AI: 9
Fully autonomous AI workers manage the entire sales pipeline from lead gen to booking meetings across channels without human intervention, operating 24/7 with adaptive learning.
Origami Agents: 6
Agents autonomously handle research, signal detection, and enrichment but require humans for outreach and deal-closing, following an augmentation philosophy rather than full replacement.
11x AI excels in end-to-end autonomy, while Origami prioritizes human-in-the-loop for precision, making 11x better for hands-off automation.
ease of use
11x AI: 7
Deep integrations with existing tools and same-day onboarding with support, but enterprise focus implies setup complexity and potential need for large contact lists.
Origami Agents: 9
No-code setup with natural language configuration for agents; user-friendly interface for specifying signals and workflows, praised for quick iteration by YC.
Origami's natural language and no-code design makes it more accessible for rapid deployment compared to 11x's integration-heavy enterprise approach.
flexibility
11x AI: 8
Customizable for multichannel (email, LinkedIn, SMS, calls), multilingual, real-time adaptation, and enterprise security; supports scaling with multiple agents.
Origami Agents: 9
Highly flexible natural language agent configuration for custom signals (e.g., hiring in fintech), real-time monitoring across 100B+ web pages, and integrations without sending messages itself.
Both are flexible, but Origami's LLM-guided, signal-specific customization edges out for precision prospecting, while 11x shines in outreach channels.
cost
11x AI: 4
High pricing at $5,000/month with annual contracts ($60K/year), scaling with volume; positioned as premium enterprise solution.
Origami Agents: 7
Pricing available on request (likely more affordable than 11x given YC batch focus and augmentation model); no public steep commitments noted.
11x is significantly pricier with long-term locks, making Origami more cost-effective for teams not needing full autonomy.
popularity
11x AI: 8
Frequently listed in top AI agent directories, ranked in comparisons, with established enterprise presence and sales-focused buzz.
Origami Agents: 6
YC-backed with strong iteration praise, but fewer public reviews, case studies, and directory mentions; emerging with limited long-term visibility.
11x has broader recognition in 2025 directories, while Origami gains traction via YC but lacks extensive reviews.
Conclusions
11x AI suits teams seeking full sales automation with high autonomy but at premium cost, ideal for scaling outbound without SDR hires. Origami Agents is better for research augmentation, offering easier setup, flexibility, and lower inferred costs for human-led teams prioritizing intent precision. Choose based on automation depth vs. human oversight needs.