Audit scope and finding reconciliation
Audit scope and finding reconciliation. Keep the source details and outstanding dependencies together.
CRITERION TEST METHOD AND EVIDENCE
AI agent for web accessibility testing agencies
A finding should survive the handoff. Your AI agent follows accessibility work through retest.
Carry a sixty-finding website audit through remediation and evidenced retest.
A specialised AI agent you can ask for more. Chat here on the site.
$149.00/month, including $60.00 in monthly credits. Monthly subscription. Before tax.
Specialised AI agentYour own report presetNo connection needed to begin
Page criterion finding and retest registerCOLLECTION / 307
YOUR SPECIALISED AI AGENT
One place for audit scope and finding reconciliation, remediation owner and retest coordination, observed retest and client-evidence delivery.
MADE FOR YOUR WORKDAYStart with work already on your desk
Your first useful assignment.
Share the relevant records in your regular Teams chat and give your specialist an outcome. No model or tool choices to make first.
Get my AI agent →YOU COULD ASK
“Use my records to prepare audit scope and finding reconciliation. Reconcile the details, save the working files and show me what needs following up.”
- Audit scope and finding reconciliation
- Remediation owner and retest coordination
- Observed retest and client-evidence delivery
A useful first result
Audit scope and finding reconciliation, with supporting references and outstanding details kept together.
Example assignment, not a promised delivery time. Your agent works from the records and access you provide. Add connections when you want it to act in other systems.
A conversation at your desk
Carry a sixty-finding website audit through remediation and evidenced retest.
This example shows an established working setup: the agent already knows the business and has the records and connections listed below. Hand over the assignment and it carries the work through to saved results.
Illustrative project · configured agent at work
A configured agent with client briefs, connected project tools, permitted account access, source files, change records and actual delivery evidence.
- Audit scope and finding reconciliation
- Remediation owner and retest coordination
- Observed retest and client-evidence delivery
A working specialist can handle the project, with a configured team sharing the work where available. This is an example of what you can build up to, not a first-launch conversation. Timing and usage depend on the assignment.
- Accessibility agency owner
Carry a sixty-finding website audit through remediation and evidenced retest. Carry the work through the connected tools and keep the working records and reports current.
- Your AI agent · AI Agent Store
Several findings refer to a retired component version and two closed tickets have no retest record. I’m resolving those dependencies and continuing the rest of the programme.
Work in progress - Accessibility agency owner
Keep keyboard and screen-reader observations separate from automated checks.
- Your AI agent · AI Agent Store
The audit now has reconciled findings, current component references and actual retest outcomes, with client evidence and remaining work clearly recorded. Your dashboard and working files reflect the recorded outcomes.
Later · delivery and saved results
CRITERION TEST METHOD AND EVIDENCE
A working brief for your AI agent.
Bring the page component and finding id and criterion test method and evidence into one working record. Your specialist uses your specifications and follows changes through completion evidence recorded and delivery and follow-up closed.
AI
Your AI agentPrepared for web accessibility testing agencies
Page criterion finding and retest register / 307EXAMPLE, NOT LIVE ACTIVITY
An example record for page component and finding id, criterion test method and evidence, finding resolution position, retested findings.
01AC1802AC2403AC31
The useful next step
Audit scope and finding reconciliation
Prepare audit scope and finding reconciliation from the available records. Save the supporting references and mark any missing details so the next step stays clear.
The details your specialist follows
A finding should survive the handoff.
Follow each page component and finding id through the working record. The example below shows how references, dependencies and resolutions stay together, so you can trace what changed and what happens next.
Keep an eye on: duplicate findings, changing component versions, missing reproduction evidence and unverified closure claims.
Illustrative working document · your records start empty
| Record | Dependency | Completion evidence |
|---|---|---|
| AC18 | Page component and finding ID | Source identity retained |
| AC24 | Criterion test method and evidence | Current specification linked |
| AC31 | Duplicate findings | Outcome reconciled |
Active page criterion finding and retest register3
Retested findings60 findings
Completion evidence recorded2
Illustrative project figures. Your agent maintains working records in normal Files and Tasks and reports completed work in Teams Dashboards. Ask it to adapt those records and reports as your workflow changes.
Built around the details that matter
Audit scope and finding reconciliation. With the right questions already in mind.
A finding should survive the handoff. Keep page or component, criterion, test method, environment and observed evidence with each finding. Coordinate remediation and perform supported checks using available tools. Distinguish automated checks, manual evaluation and user testing; report only observed retest outcomes and never treat a limited sample as a site-wide compliance guarantee.
Remediation owner and retest coordination
Remediation owner and retest coordination. Track changes against the same job reference.
Observed retest and client-evidence delivery
Observed retest and client-evidence delivery. Save the outcome and carry the next steps into your working records.
From enquiry to a useful next step
Page criterion finding and retest register. Your way of working.
01
Page component brief received
Add a job reference and the details you already know.
02
Scope and references reconciled
Page component and finding ID and Criterion test method and evidence, ready to check.
03
Dependencies coordinated
Give your specialist the outcome and let it carry the work forward.
04
Completion evidence recorded
Keep working records in Files and Tasks.
05
Delivery and follow-up closed
Keep the job and its next steps together.
Ask your specialist to maintain your working records in Files and Tasks and adapt the reports in Teams Dashboards. These are the regular platform tools, prepared for your business. Connections to other systems are optional.
A small tool for a real job
Accessibility findings in the programme. Before the back-and-forth.
Duplicate findings, changing component versions, missing reproduction evidence and unverified closure claims.
Try the numbers, then bring the confirmed brief to your specialist. Start with a reference such as “Job 104”—you do not need to upload your customer database.
- Page component and finding ID
- Criterion test method and evidence
- Finding resolution position
- Retested findings
Try your own numbers
Accessibility findings in the programme
Planning arithmetic from your inputs. Your specialist can turn the confirmed details into a working brief. This is not a quote or capacity commitment.
Prepared for your business
The numbers behind your accessibility evidence desk.
Six useful measures, ready in your regular Teams dashboard. Your specialist keeps them up to date from the real work and records it can access. Ask it to change a measure, add a report or investigate what is behind a result.
Recorded total · findings
Accessibility findings retested
What this measures
Actual completed findings in page criterion finding and retest register, recorded once per source job and completion line. Use observed quantities from the source records for accessibility findings retested; planned quantities, duplicate updates and illustrative figures are excluded.
Recorded cases · cases
Finding-reference conflicts resolved
What this measures
Completed finding-reference conflicts resolved cases with the required delivery evidence and follow-up reconciled. Count once per original case identity; reopening does not create another completion.
Recorded cases · cases
Reproduction-evidence gaps closed
What this measures
Distinct reproduction-evidence gaps closed cases, with source evidence from the page criterion finding and retest register. Count only cases with documented resolution, once per source issue; messages and reminders are not separate resolutions.
Average · hours
Recorded remediation to completed retest evidence
What this measures
Elapsed hours for recorded remediation to completed retest evidence, using actual start and completion timestamps for the same case. Record one duration per completed case; pending work and missing timestamps are excluded.
Observed rate · %
Closed findings supported by observed retest evidence
What this measures
Closed findings supported by observed retest evidence divided by all assessed cases with a known outcome under the same recorded criterion. Record one met or not_met outcome per case and review window; unassessed or pending cases are excluded.
Observed rate · %
Agreed audit delivery dates met
What this measures
Agreed audit delivery dates met divided by completed cases with both a recorded agreed deadline and actual completion time. Keep the promise in force when the work was committed; do not move it retrospectively to turn late work into on-time work. Exclude unknown deadlines and pending cases.
Your reports start empty. Figures reflect observed work in the selected period; missing records are not treated as measured zeroes. Current jobs, schedules and stock stay in your working files and tasks. You and your agent can adapt the dashboard as your business changes.
Keep the tools that already work
Specialised in your trade. Open to your next idea.
Your AI agent starts with the details of your business already in mind. The three workflows are starting points. Ask it for help with another task in the same conversation.
An AI agent prepared for your business
The starting instructions, intake questions and working rules already match web accessibility testing agencies. Add your service list and one example of your tone when you are ready.
Give your agent the whole job
Give your agent an outcome, the access it needs and your budget. It handles routine decisions and follows through in your connected tools, asking when a missing business decision needs you. Set or change your own boundaries whenever you want.
Ask beyond the starting workflows
Ask it to compare suppliers, prepare customer updates or analyse recurring issues in your page criterion finding and retest register. It can take on a wider assignment in the same conversation. Give your agent another task in plain language. What it can carry out depends on the tools you connect and the access you choose.
Recommended starting plan
Your AI agent for web accessibility testing agencies.
Begin with one specialist and a report preset for your business. After setup, your regular Agent Teams conversation opens. No tool selection before your first conversation.
$149.00/month
Capacity for 3 running agents · 250 active hours per month
Start my AI agent →A clear starting total
$149.00 before tax today and monthly, including $60.00 in Platform Credits after the first payment and each paid renewal.
Unused credits roll over. AI usage draws from your balance; additional credits are available when needed. $0.15 applies per active hour beyond the included allowance. Optional voice and other services cost extra.
Hosting availability is checked before payment. Create your account, confirm your monthly subscription, then start chatting when your specialist is ready. Your instructions and dashboard are prepared automatically after payment.
Automatic top-ups start off. Buy credits manually or set automatic top-ups and spending limits in your account. Keep the full Teams controls for models, connections and supported settings.
Before you begin
At your accessibility evidence desk.
Will it preserve criterion test method and evidence through the whole job?
Keep page or component, criterion, test method, environment and observed evidence with each finding. Coordinate remediation and perform supported checks using available tools. Distinguish automated checks, manual evaluation and user testing; report only observed retest outcomes and never treat a limited sample as a site-wide compliance guarantee.
Is this only for the three tasks shown?
No. This is an AI agent specialised for web accessibility testing agencies, with three prepared workflows to get you started. You can ask for writing, research, planning, analysis or another task in the same chat. It can make routine decisions and carry the work through using available tools. You set its boundaries; it asks when a real business decision or missing access needs you.
What happens after I subscribe?
After payment, we prepare your AI agent for web accessibility testing agencies, its workflows and your page criterion finding and retest register dashboard. Your regular Agent Teams chat opens when setup is ready. Files, Tasks, settings and billing work the same as for other customers. Reports start empty and count actual reported work; the examples above are illustrative.
Do I need to connect email or messaging?
No. Prepare your first brief and draft here. Connect external channels later when you want the specialist to work there.
Does this replace my existing business software?
Use it alongside your current tools for preparing work and organising jobs. Live stock, availability, sending and payment records require a verified connection or your own confirmation.
Choosing for a different business?
Compare the working records and business types each specialist is prepared for.
Explore AI agents for creative and digital services →