Agentic AI Comparison:
Unitree R1 vs Waymo
vs
Introduction
This report compares the Unitree R1, a compact and affordable humanoid robot designed for agility and research, with Waymo, a leader in autonomous robotaxi services using self-driving vehicles. The comparison evaluates them across specified metrics despite their differing categories: personal robotics versus commercial autonomous mobility.
Overview
Unitree R1
The Unitree R1 is a 1.2m tall, 25kg humanoid robot with 26 degrees of freedom, emphasizing agility in movements like flips and running. Priced at $5,900 for the base model, it is remote-controlled with limited autonomy, 1-hour battery life, and supports developer customization via EDU version.
Waymo
Waymo operates fully autonomous robotaxi services with sensor-rich vehicles (LiDAR, radar, cameras) for safe ride-hailing. It leads in real-world deployment across multiple cities, millions of miles driven, and polished user experience as of 2026, but requires no user operation.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
Unitree R1: 3
Primarily remote-controlled or teleoperated with no demonstrated true autonomy beyond limited demos; lacks self-learning or independent task execution.
Waymo: 10
Fully autonomous operation in real-world ride-hailing with proven safety over millions of miles, advanced sensors, and end-to-end navigation without human intervention.
Waymo excels in operational autonomy for transportation, while R1 is early-stage and human-dependent.
ease of use
Unitree R1: 7
Compact, lightweight (25kg), portable design with modern connectivity (Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth), OTA updates, and low development threshold via multimodal models; base model limits secondary development.
Waymo: 9
Polished rider app and experience for seamless booking and travel; no driving skills needed, though fleet access is location/service-dependent.
R1 suits developers/hobbyists for hands-on control; Waymo prioritizes effortless consumer use.
flexibility
Unitree R1: 8
High agility for dynamic movements (flips, boxing), 26 DoF, optional dexterous hands and NVIDIA Jetson in EDU version; adaptable for research, but fixed hands in base and short battery limit tasks.
Waymo: 6
Versatile for urban ride-hailing, expanding cities; confined to vehicle transport, not general tasks like manipulation or personal assistance.
R1 offers physical versatility in motion; Waymo is specialized for mobility services.
cost
Unitree R1: 9
$5,900 base model, significantly cheaper than predecessors or competitors, with in-house manufacturing enabling affordability; batteries separate.
Waymo: 5
Ride-hailing service-based (per-ride pricing, undisclosed fleet costs); accessible without ownership but ongoing fees; high development investment reflected in premium service.
R1 provides ownership at low upfront cost; Waymo is subscription-like for service.
popularity
Unitree R1: 6
Gaining industry buzz for affordability and agility; focused on research/commercial exploration, not yet widespread adoption.
Waymo: 10
Market leader in robotaxis with 2026 awards, multi-city expansion, millions of miles, and strong public recognition.
Waymo dominates consumer-facing autonomous tech; R1 is emerging in robotics niche.
Conclusions
Unitree R1 outperforms in cost and flexibility for personal/developer use (average score ~6.6), ideal for agile humanoid experimentation. Waymo leads in autonomy and popularity for practical deployment (average score ~8), suiting mobility services. Choice depends on needs: robotics R&D vs. autonomous transport.