Agentic AI Comparison:
Tely AI vs TEN Framework
vs
Introduction
This report compares Tely AI (a hosted autonomous B2B content marketing agent) and TEN Framework (an open-source framework for building real-time multimodal conversational agents) across autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, cost, and popularity, focusing on how each suits different AI-agent use cases.
Overview
TEN Framework
TEN Framework is an open-source framework for building real-time multimodal conversational AI and voice agents, providing infrastructure for low-latency streaming, VAD and turn detection, and customizable agent pipelines so developers can build and run their own agents rather than using a hosted vertical product.
Tely AI
Tely AI is a vertical, fully managed autonomous AI content agent for B2B marketing that performs SEO analysis, plans a multi-article content strategy, writes and publishes blog posts, manages internal linking, integrates with analytics tools like Google Search Console, and captures leads—essentially acting as an automated content and SEO team for businesses.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
Tely AI: 9
Tely AI autonomously handles end-to-end B2B content operations: it analyzes a site and competitors for SEO, generates a detailed content strategy (e.g., 60-article plans), writes SEO-optimized articles, publishes them directly to blogs via CMS integrations, manages internal linking, and monitors performance with minimal ongoing human intervention.
TEN Framework: 7
TEN Framework enables highly autonomous agents but does not provide autonomy out of the box; instead, it offers real-time, multimodal conversational infrastructure (streaming, turn detection, etc.) that developers must program and orchestrate into autonomous behaviors, making autonomy dependent on user implementation rather than being a turnkey agent.
Tely AI delivers task-level, turnkey autonomy for a specific business workflow (B2B content marketing), while TEN Framework provides the building blocks for autonomy in conversational agents; Tely AI is more autonomous for its niche, whereas TEN Framework is more of a foundation that developers must extend.
ease of use
Tely AI: 9
Tely AI targets marketers and business users rather than developers, offering a SaaS-style interface where users configure their website, industry, and goals and then let the system handle keyword research, content generation, publishing, and linking, significantly reducing manual SEO and content work and requiring little technical setup.
TEN Framework: 6
TEN Framework is aimed at developers building real-time multimodal conversational systems; working with it involves understanding agent pipelines, streaming, and low-latency conversational design, which offers power but introduces a higher learning curve and engineering overhead compared to a plug-and-play SaaS tool.
For non-technical teams, Tely AI is far easier to use, functioning like a specialized marketing assistant, while TEN Framework demands software engineering skills and deep configuration, making it better suited to technical teams that want detailed control over agent behavior.
flexibility
Tely AI: 6
Tely AI is flexible within B2B content marketing—supporting various industries, SEO strategies, content styles, and integrations with different CMS platforms—but it is still a focused, opinionated system optimized for SEO blog content and lead capture rather than a general-purpose agent framework.
TEN Framework: 9
TEN Framework is designed as a general, extensible infrastructure for multimodal conversational AI, enabling voice agents, text chatbots, and other real-time agents with customizable pipelines and components; developers can adapt it to many domains and flows, making it highly flexible for agent architecture and behavior.
Tely AI is functionally flexible but domain-specific, while TEN Framework offers broad architectural and domain flexibility at the cost of requiring more custom development.
cost
Tely AI: 7
Tely AI follows a subscription model sized for businesses, with pricing that reflects its bundled value as an autonomous SEO and content team; for companies that would otherwise hire writers and SEO specialists, this can be cost-effective, but for very small teams or solo creators it may be relatively expensive compared to lighter-weight tools.
TEN Framework: 8
TEN Framework is open source, so the framework itself can be used at no licensing cost, but deploying production systems still incurs infrastructure and model-inference expenses, and requires developer time; this can be cost-efficient at scale, particularly for teams that can amortize engineering effort across multiple agents.
Tely AI has predictable SaaS pricing that packages infrastructure, models, and operational work into one fee, whereas TEN Framework shifts cost to engineering time and runtime infrastructure; for non-technical teams, Tely AI may be cheaper than hiring specialists, while technical teams may find TEN Framework more economical and scalable over many custom agents.
popularity
Tely AI: 6
Tely AI appears in comparison and alternatives lists on industry blogs and software marketplaces, indicating meaningful but niche adoption among businesses seeking autonomous SEO and content tools, though it is not as widely recognized as generic content-creation or design platforms like Canva or Jasper.
TEN Framework: 7
TEN Framework, as an open-source project focused on agent infrastructure, is featured in discussions and lists of AI agent frameworks and is used by developers exploring real-time multimodal agents; within the developer and open-source ecosystem it has growing visibility, though it is still emerging compared with the most popular general-purpose AI frameworks.
Tely AI is relatively popular within the AI content/SEO niche, while TEN Framework has growing recognition in the agent-framework and developer community; neither is yet a mass-market standard, but each has traction in its respective audience.
Conclusions
Tely AI and TEN Framework serve different but complementary roles in the AI-agent landscape: Tely AI is best for businesses wanting a high-autonomy, low-friction SaaS agent dedicated to B2B content marketing and SEO, while TEN Framework is better for technical teams needing a highly flexible, open-source foundation for building real-time multimodal conversational agents; the optimal choice depends on whether the priority is turnkey marketing outcomes with minimal engineering (Tely AI) or customizable agent infrastructure and long-term extensibility (TEN Framework).