This report provides a detailed comparison of two AI agents, Nova Act by Amazon and Manus by Butterfly Effect, across key metrics including autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, cost, and popularity. Both agents are recent entries in the rapidly evolving AI agentic technology space, offering users unique features, applications, and pricing structures.
Nova Act is Amazon's browser-based AI agent designed to perform complex, multistep tasks autonomously. It excels in e-commerce and operational automation, offering modular task execution with minimal user intervention. Available in the US, Nova Act supports variants like Nova Micro, Lite, and Pro, geared towards diverse use cases and developer experimentation.
Manus, developed by Butterfly Effect, is a universal AI agent designed to autonomously handle complex tasks ranging from planning to analysis. It utilizes a multi-model architecture and achieves state-of-the-art benchmarks, focusing on real-world problem-solving capabilities. Manus is available in subscription tiers and integrates multiple scenarios, including information gathering, business decision-making, and travel planning.
Manus: 9
Manus achieves a higher level of autonomy, surpassing benchmarks like GAIA, with advanced capabilities to handle diverse, complex real-world tasks independently.
Nova Act: 8
Nova Act demonstrates high autonomy, capable of independently completing multistep tasks in web environments, such as e-commerce operations and form submissions.
While both agents are largely autonomous, Manus's broader scope and advanced planning capabilities edge out Nova Act's focus on browser-based tasks.
Manus: 7
Manus's powerful interface provides detailed task visibility but faces usability challenges, such as system crashes during extended use.
Nova Act: 8
Nova Act provides an intuitive developer SDK and modular task design, simplifying integration, but remains US-centric and platform-specific.
Nova Act's simplicity and modular design make it slightly easier to use than Manus, which requires more user feedback for optimization.
Manus: 9
Manus integrates multiple models and tools, offering wide-ranging applications from travel to stock analysis, showcasing significant flexibility.
Nova Act: 7
Nova Act is highly capable within its specialized domain but is limited to web environments and lacks multimodal flexibility.
Manus demonstrates greater versatility as it is designed for diverse real-world tasks, whereas Nova Act is optimized for specific web-based operations.
Manus: 8
Manus offers affordable subscription plans at $39-$199/month, making it accessible but potentially more expensive for pro-tier users handling multiple tasks simultaneously.
Nova Act: 9
Nova Act is competitively priced, with models like Nova Lite and Pro offering cost-effective solutions for tasks at lower token costs than many competitors.
Nova Act's token-based pricing offers a slight cost advantage, particularly for users requiring scalable, cost-efficient task executions.
Manus: 8
Manus has garnered significant attention through viral demos and strong performance benchmarks, but is constrained by limited beta access.
Nova Act: 8
Nova Act benefits from Amazon's established market presence and developer outreach through its SDK.
Both agents are gaining traction, with Nova Act relying on Amazon's ecosystem and Manus fostering excitement as a new entrant with standout features.
Both Nova Act and Manus represent cutting-edge advancements in AI agents, each excelling in their respective domains. Nova Act is ideal for users seeking browser-based task automation with modular flexibility and competitive pricing. Manus, on the other hand, stands out for its real-world adaptability, autonomous execution of complex tasks, and broader functionality. The choice between the two largely depends on user priorities, such as the need for web-specific operations or a universal task-performing agent.