Agentic AI Comparison:
Browser-Use vs Suna by Kortix AI
vs
Introduction
This report provides a detailed comparison between Browser-Use (an open-source browser automation agent) and Suna by Kortix AI (a modular, generalist open-source AI agent platform). The evaluation focuses on five key metrics: autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, cost, and popularity. Each tool is assessed based on its documented features, user experience, and reception within the developer and automation communities as of June 2025.
Overview
Browser-Use
Browser-Use is an open-source utility focused on browser automation. Designed primarily for automating interactions with web browsers, it is suited for tasks like website testing, data extraction, and repetitive browser actions. Its strength lies in its specific focus, which provides a straightforward experience for automating web-based workflows.
Suna by Kortix AI
Suna by Kortix AI is a fully open-source generalist AI agent capable of autonomously executing complex real-world tasks based on natural language instructions. It integrates browser automation, document generation, advanced web scraping, file management, command-line operations, and API integrations within a modular architecture. Suna can be deployed via the cloud or self-hosted, offering both depth and flexibility in automating multifaceted workflows.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
Browser-Use: 6
Browser-Use provides solid browser automation capabilities but typically requires user input for specific task definitions and scripting. It does not possess autonomous, context-aware task management or general-purpose reasoning abilities.
Suna by Kortix AI: 9
Suna is designed as an autonomous agent capable of executing complex, multifaceted tasks end-to-end using natural language. Its ability to understand context, automate workflows, and integrate multiple tools (browser, files, command-line, APIs) demonstrates a high level of autonomy.
Suna outpaces Browser-Use in autonomy, acting as a generalist agent versus Browser-Use's task-focused scripting approach.
ease of use
Browser-Use: 7
Browser-Use provides a streamlined interface for browser automation but generally requires users to define tasks via scripting or configuration files, which introduces a learning curve, especially for non-developers.
Suna by Kortix AI: 8
Suna's interface is noted as intuitive and easy to use, modeled after popular AI agents like Manus. It excels in enabling users to automate complex tasks through natural language conversation, reducing the need for technical setup.
While both are accessible, Suna's conversational interface provides a more user-friendly experience for complex workflows than the more developer-oriented Browser-Use.
flexibility
Browser-Use: 6
Browser-Use is highly effective for standard browser automation but is limited outside those domains. Its flexibility is constrained to web-based scenarios and lacks built-in support for document handling, system operations, or API integrations.
Suna by Kortix AI: 9
Suna is architected for flexibility, supporting browser automation, document creation, system commands, web scraping, and API integrations. Its modular design enables adaptation to a broad range of use cases within a single agent.
Suna offers significantly broader flexibility, supporting many domains of automation, whereas Browser-Use is more specialized.
cost
Browser-Use: 10
Browser-Use is fully open-source and free to use, making it cost-effective for individual users and organizations.
Suna by Kortix AI: 10
Suna is also fully open-source and free, available for both cloud deployment and self-hosting without charge.
Both agents are open-source and free, offering high value with no direct costs.
popularity
Browser-Use: 5
Browser-Use maintains a presence among open-source automation enthusiasts but has a more niche and focused user base compared to more general AI agents.
Suna by Kortix AI: 8
Since its release, Suna has rapidly gained attention in the AI and automation communities, becoming a central topic among developers seeking open-source AGI alternatives and workflow automation tools.
Suna is currently enjoying broader community interest and adoption, especially among those seeking general-purpose AI automation.
Conclusions
Browser-Use and Suna by Kortix AI both excel as open-source tools for automation, but serve different purposes. Browser-Use is excellent for targeted browser automation and is ideally suited for users needing focused, scriptable solutions. Suna, on the other hand, stands out as a generalist AI agent capable of end-to-end workflow automation using natural language. Suna's autonomy, flexibility, and expanding community presence position it as the more advanced and versatile choice for users seeking comprehensive automation across domains. For those needing specialized browser automation, Browser-Use remains a reliable and cost-effective option.