Agentic AI Comparison:
Browser-Use vs OneQuery
vs
Introduction
This report provides a detailed comparison between two AI web agents, Browser-Use and OneQuery, evaluating them across five key metrics: autonomy, ease of use, flexibility, cost, and popularity. Insights are drawn from recent technical reviews and public benchmarks to present an objective assessment of each tool's strengths and weaknesses as of June 2025.
Overview
Browser-Use
Browser-Use is an open-source Python framework built on Playwright, specializing in web automation tasks such as navigation, form filling, data extraction, and custom automation. Known for its strong customization, multi-model support, and robust web task execution, it is designed for developers and researchers who require flexibility and control for advanced web workflows.
OneQuery
OneQuery is an AI web agent focused on simple, powerful web interactions and user-centric design. It offers out-of-the-box ease of use, competitive pricing, and is often chosen for its smooth setup and efficiency with everyday web queries and automations. OneQuery is accessible as both a web app and open-source project.
Metrics Comparison
autonomy
Browser-Use: 8
Browser-Use excels at executing multi-step web tasks, reliably navigates websites, and supports advanced automation through customizable scripts. However, independent third-party benchmarks report a significant gap between self-assessed and actual performance, with occasional overestimation of its capabilities, leading to some execution mismatches.
OneQuery: 7
OneQuery delivers effective autonomous handling of simple to moderate web tasks and offers a user experience aimed at non-technical users. It may have less depth in complex task chaining or error recovery compared to Browser-Use, but offers consistent and predictable automation for most mainstream use cases.
Browser-Use provides more autonomous capabilities for advanced web scenarios, though with variability in real-world reliability, while OneQuery offers dependable autonomy for common tasks.
ease of use
Browser-Use: 6
Browser-Use requires installation, setup, and some coding to unlock its full capabilities, making it less approachable for non-technical users. Its extensive customization appeals to power users but increases the entry barrier.
OneQuery: 9
OneQuery is known for its user-friendly interface and straightforward onboarding. It is designed with simplicity in mind, making it accessible to a wide audience, including those without technical backgrounds.
OneQuery is significantly easier to use for the majority of users, while Browser-Use is more suited to users comfortable with technical configuration and scripting.
flexibility
Browser-Use: 9
Browser-Use stands out for model flexibility, custom functions, multi-tab support, and integration options, making it highly adaptable for complex workflows and research applications.
OneQuery: 6
OneQuery is designed for streamlined workflows and typical automations. While efficient, its flexibility is more limited and tailored to predefined scenarios or mainstream tasks.
Browser-Use offers greater flexibility and extensibility for developers; OneQuery prioritizes simplicity over customizability.
cost
Browser-Use: 10
Browser-Use is open-source and can be self-hosted for free, making it extremely cost-effective, especially for organizations or individuals seeking to minimize ongoing expenses.
OneQuery: 8
OneQuery offers both a free open-source edition and paid plans for premium features, striking a balance between accessibility and ongoing feature development. Some advanced features may require a subscription.
Both agents offer free access, but Browser-Use is fully open-source with no inherent costs, while OneQuery has both free and premium options.
popularity
Browser-Use: 7
Browser-Use is recognized in technical communities and is frequently cited in agent benchmarking and research but may have a smaller user base due to its technical orientation.
OneQuery: 8
OneQuery has gained traction among general users due to its ease of use and accessible web presence, reflected in positive comparisons and broad appeal.
OneQuery appears more popular among casual and business users, whereas Browser-Use maintains a niche following among developers and researchers.
Conclusions
Browser-Use distinguishes itself through advanced flexibility, multi-model support, and complete cost transparency, making it ideal for technically skilled users seeking customizable solutions. OneQuery excels in user experience, ease of access, and broad appeal, suiting users who value convenience and simplicity. Organizations or individuals should choose based on their technical proficiency, customization needs, and willingness to trade depth for usability.