Agentic AI Comparison:
AutoCodeRover vs Devra
vs
Introduction
This report compares two AI-powered software development assistants: AutoCodeRover and Devra. Both aim to automate aspects of software engineering, but they have different approaches and capabilities.
Overview
AutoCodeRover
AutoCodeRover is an autonomous program improvement tool developed by researchers at the National University of Singapore. It focuses on resolving GitHub issues, including bug fixes and feature additions, by combining large language models with code analysis and debugging capabilities.
Devra
Devra is an AI-powered software development assistant that aims to automate various aspects of the software development lifecycle. It offers features like code generation, refactoring, and bug fixing, though specific details about its capabilities are limited based on the available information.
Metrics Comparison
Autonomy
AutoCodeRover: 9
AutoCodeRover demonstrates high autonomy by automatically analyzing GitHub issues, searching codebases, and generating patches without human intervention.
Devra: 7
While Devra likely offers automated features, there's insufficient information to determine if it matches AutoCodeRover's level of autonomy in issue resolution.
AutoCodeRover appears to have an edge in autonomy, particularly in its ability to independently resolve GitHub issues.
Ease of Use
AutoCodeRover: 7
AutoCodeRover can be run via Docker or local setup, with clear instructions provided. However, it requires some technical setup and command-line usage.
Devra: 8
As a commercial product, Devra likely offers a more user-friendly interface, though specific details are not available.
Devra may be easier to use for non-technical users, while AutoCodeRover might appeal more to developers comfortable with command-line tools.
Flexibility
AutoCodeRover: 8
AutoCodeRover supports multiple programming languages and can work with various LLM models. It offers different modes of operation (GitHub issue, local issue, SWE-bench).
Devra: 7
Devra likely offers flexibility in terms of supported languages and integration with development workflows, but specific details are not available.
AutoCodeRover demonstrates good flexibility, especially in its ability to work with different models and issue sources. Devra's flexibility is less clear from available information.
Cost
AutoCodeRover: 9
AutoCodeRover is reported to be highly cost-effective, with an average cost of $0.43 USD per issue resolved.
Devra: 6
As a commercial product, Devra likely has associated costs, but specific pricing information is not available.
AutoCodeRover appears to be more cost-effective, especially for research or open-source use. Devra's cost structure is unclear but may be more suitable for enterprise environments.
Popularity
AutoCodeRover: 7
AutoCodeRover has gained attention in academic circles and was recently acquired by Sonar, indicating growing interest.
Devra: 6
Devra's popularity is difficult to assess due to limited information, but as a commercial product, it may have a established user base.
AutoCodeRover seems to have more visible academic and industry recognition, while Devra's popularity in commercial settings is less clear.
Conclusions
AutoCodeRover stands out for its high autonomy, cost-effectiveness, and research-backed approach to resolving GitHub issues. It shows promise in automating significant parts of the software improvement process. Devra, as a commercial product, may offer a more polished user experience and could be more suitable for enterprise environments. However, the limited available information on Devra makes a comprehensive comparison challenging. Both tools represent the growing trend of AI-assisted software development, with AutoCodeRover focusing more on autonomous issue resolution and Devra potentially offering a broader range of development assistance features.